From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44E0B6B005C for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:53:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n6A8Ghfr002976 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:16:43 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918A245DE58 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:16:43 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4B345DE56 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:16:43 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295ED1DB8041 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:16:43 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C0DE18010 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:16:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:14:57 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Memory controller soft limit organize cgroups (v8) Message-Id: <20090710171457.e2e52319.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090710080557.GF20129@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090709171441.8080.85983.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20090709171501.8080.85138.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20090710142135.8079cd22.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090710080557.GF20129@balbir.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro List-ID: On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:35:57 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-07-10 14:21:35]: > > > > > As pointed out in several times, plz avoid using jiffies. > > Sorry, I forgot to respond to this part. Are you suggesting we avoid > jiffies (use ktime_t) or the time based approach. I responded to the > time base versus scanning approach to the mail earlier. > > - IIUC, it was a comment to old patches "don't use jiffies, count event" (by Andrew Morton ?) I fully agree with that. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org