* Re: + memory-hotplug-exclude-isolated-page-from-pco-page-alloc.patch added to -mm tree
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906291818460.21956@gentwo.org>
@ 2009-06-30 1:03 ` Shaohua Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2009-06-30 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter; +Cc: akpm, linux-mm, linux-kernel, mel, Zhao, Yakui
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:20:00AM +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>
> > Pages marked as isolated should not be allocated again. If such pages
> > reside in pcp list, they can be allocated too, so there is a ping-pong
> > memory offline frees some pages to pcp list and the pages get allocated
> > and then memory offline frees them again, this loop will happen again and
> > again.
>
> Isolated pages are freed? Could they not be kept on a separate
> list with refcount elevated until the isolation procedure is complete?
Yes, they can be freed and add into pcp list. Moving them to a separate list
is feasible, but the approach is more intrusive to me. As I explained in the
patch, adding check in buffered_rmqueue() should hasn't impact for normal path.
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread