Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: stop balance_dirty_pages doing too much work

[Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>]

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:38:24 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > When writing to 2 (or more) devices at the same time, stop
> > > > > balance_dirty_pages moving dirty pages to writeback when it has
> > > > > reached the bdi threshold. This prevents balance_dirty_pages
> > > > > overshooting its limits and moving all dirty pages to writeback.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
> > > > > ---
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> >
> > After doing some integration and update work on the writeback branch, I
> > threw 2.6.31-rc1, 2.6.31-rc1+patch, 2.6.31-rc1+writeback into the test
> > mix. The writeback series include this patch as a prep patch. Results
> > for the mmap write test case:
> >
> > Kernel          Throughput      usr     sys     ctx     util
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > vanilla         184MB/sec       19.51%  50.49%  12995   82.88%
> > vanilla         184MB/sec       19.60%  50.77%  12846   83.47%
> > vanilla         182MB/sec       19.25%  51.18%  14692   82.76%
> > vanilla+patch   169MB/sec       18.08%  43.61%   9507   76.38%
> > vanilla+patch   170MB/sec       18.37%  43.46%  10275   76.62%
> > vanilla+patch   165MB/sec       17.59%  42.06%  10165   74.39%
> > writeback       215MB/sec       22.69%  53.23%   4085   92.32%
> > writeback       214MB/sec       24.31%  52.90%   4495   92.40%
> > writeback       208MB/sec       23.14%  52.12%   4067   91.68%
> >
> > To be perfectly clear:
> >
> > vanilla         2.6.31-rc1 stock
> > vanilla+patch   2.6.31-rc1 + bdi_thresh patch
> > writeback       2.6.31-rc1 + bdi_thresh patch + writeback series
> >
> > This is just a single spindle w/ext4, nothing fancy. I'll do a 3-series
> > run with the writeback and this patch backed out, to see if it makes a
> > difference here. I didn't do that initially, since the results were in
> > the range that I expected.
>
> Results for writeback without the bdi_thresh patch
>
> Kernel          Throughput      usr     sys     ctx     util
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> wb-bdi_thresh   211MB/sec       22.71%  53.30%   4050   91.19%
> wb-bdi_thresh   212MB/sec       22.78%  53.55%   4809   91.51%
> wb-bdi_thresh   212MB/sec       22.99%  54.23%   4715   93.10%
>
> Not a lot of difference there, without more than three runs it's hard to
> say what is significant. Could be a small decrease in throughput, if the
> 208MB/sec results from above is an outlier (I think it is, ~215MB/sec is
> usually the most consistent result).

What's the iowait on these runs?


Thanks!

--
Al

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>