linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: stop balance_dirty_pages doing too much work
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:26:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090625092642.GG31415@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090625091033.GF31415@kernel.dk>

On Thu, Jun 25 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:38:24 +0100
> > > Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > When writing to 2 (or more) devices at the same time, stop
> > > > balance_dirty_pages moving dirty pages to writeback when it has reached
> > > > the bdi threshold. This prevents balance_dirty_pages overshooting its
> > > > limits and moving all dirty pages to writeback.     
> > > > 
> > > >     
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
> > > > ---
> > 
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> 
> After doing some integration and update work on the writeback branch, I
> threw 2.6.31-rc1, 2.6.31-rc1+patch, 2.6.31-rc1+writeback into the test
> mix. The writeback series include this patch as a prep patch. Results
> for the mmap write test case:
> 
> Kernel          Throughput      usr     sys     ctx     util
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> vanilla         184MB/sec       19.51%  50.49%  12995   82.88%
> vanilla         184MB/sec       19.60%  50.77%  12846   83.47%
> vanilla         182MB/sec       19.25%  51.18%  14692   82.76%
> vanilla+patch   169MB/sec       18.08%  43.61%   9507   76.38%
> vanilla+patch   170MB/sec       18.37%  43.46%  10275   76.62%
> vanilla+patch   165MB/sec       17.59%  42.06%  10165   74.39%
> writeback       215MB/sec       22.69%  53.23%   4085   92.32%
> writeback       214MB/sec       24.31%  52.90%   4495   92.40%
> writeback       208MB/sec       23.14%  52.12%   4067   91.68%
> 
> To be perfectly clear:
> 
> vanilla         2.6.31-rc1 stock
> vanilla+patch   2.6.31-rc1 + bdi_thresh patch
> writeback       2.6.31-rc1 + bdi_thresh patch + writeback series
> 
> This is just a single spindle w/ext4, nothing fancy. I'll do a 3-series
> run with the writeback and this patch backed out, to see if it makes a
> difference here. I didn't do that initially, since the results were in
> the range that I expected.

Results for writeback without the bdi_thresh patch

Kernel          Throughput      usr     sys     ctx     util
--------------------------------------------------------------
wb-bdi_thresh   211MB/sec       22.71%  53.30%   4050   91.19%
wb-bdi_thresh   212MB/sec       22.78%  53.55%   4809   91.51%
wb-bdi_thresh   212MB/sec       22.99%  54.23%   4715   93.10%

Not a lot of difference there, without more than three runs it's hard to
say what is significant. Could be a small decrease in throughput, if the
208MB/sec results from above is an outlier (I think it is, ~215MB/sec is
usually the most consistent result).

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-25  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-24 10:38 Richard Kennedy
2009-06-24 22:27 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-25  5:13   ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-25  8:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-25  9:10     ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-25  9:26       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-06-25 12:33         ` Al Boldi
2009-06-25 12:43           ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-25 13:46             ` Al Boldi
2009-06-25 14:44               ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-25 17:10                 ` Al Boldi
2009-06-26  5:02                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-26 11:37                     ` Al Boldi
2009-06-26 12:35                       ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-26  9:15       ` Richard Kennedy
2009-06-26  9:20         ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-07 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-07 14:36   ` Richard Kennedy
2009-08-07 14:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-07 15:22     ` Chris Mason
2009-08-07 16:09       ` Richard Kennedy
2009-08-07 21:02         ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090625092642.GG31415@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox