From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, npiggin@suse.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
fengguang.wu@intel.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: handle_mm_fault() calling convention cleanup..
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:20:01 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090621.192001.46889618.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906211331480.3240@localhost.localdomain>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
> I fixed up all architectures that I noticed (at least microblaze had been
> added since the original patches in April), but arch maintainers should
> double-check. Arch maintainers might also want to check whether the
> mindless conversion of
>
> 'is_write' => 'is_write ? FAULT_FLAGS_WRITE : 0'
>
> might perhaps be written in some more natural way (for example, maybe
> you'd like to get rid of 'iswrite' as a variable entirely, and replace it
> with a 'fault_flags' variable).
>
> It's pushed out and tested on x86-64, but it really was such a mindless
> conversion that I hope it works on all architectures. But I thought I'd
> better give people a shout-out regardless.
Sparc looks good, and sparc64 seems to work fine.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-21 20:42 Linus Torvalds
2009-06-22 2:20 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-06-22 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-22 9:26 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-06-22 14:22 ` David Howells
2009-06-22 14:58 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-22 15:49 ` Russell King
2009-06-23 7:18 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-23 12:49 ` [PATCH] hugetlb: fault flags instead of write_access Hugh Dickins
2009-06-23 12:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-23 21:36 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-29 12:29 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-23 12:52 ` [PATCH] mm: don't rely on flags coincidence Hugh Dickins
2009-06-23 13:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-23 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-03 23:35 ` handle_mm_fault() calling convention cleanup Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-04 16:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-04 21:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-06 7:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-06 10:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-06 11:53 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090621.192001.46889618.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox