From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Use per hstate nodes_allowed to constrain huge page allocation
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:18:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090618091826.GB14903@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245260823.6235.91.camel@lts-notebook>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 01:47:03PM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:39 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:53:01AM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > > [PATCH 3/5] Use per hstate nodes_allowed to constrain huge page allocation
> > >
> > > Against: 17may09 mmotm
> > >
> > > Select only nodes from the per hstate nodes_allowed mask when
> > > promoting surplus pages to persistent or when allocating fresh
> > > huge pages to the pool.
> > >
> > > Note that alloc_buddy_huge_page() still uses task policy to allocate
> > > surplus huge pages. This could be changed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
> > >
> > > mm/hugetlb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-2.6.30-rc8-mmotm-090603-1633/mm/hugetlb.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.30-rc8-mmotm-090603-1633.orig/mm/hugetlb.c 2009-06-04 12:59:32.000000000 -0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.30-rc8-mmotm-090603-1633/mm/hugetlb.c 2009-06-04 12:59:33.000000000 -0400
> > > @@ -637,9 +637,9 @@ static struct page *alloc_fresh_huge_pag
> > > static int hstate_next_node(struct hstate *h)
> > > {
> > > int next_nid;
> > > - next_nid = next_node(h->hugetlb_next_nid, node_online_map);
> > > + next_nid = next_node(h->hugetlb_next_nid, *h->nodes_allowed);
> > > if (next_nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
> > > - next_nid = first_node(node_online_map);
> > > + next_nid = first_node(*h->nodes_allowed);
> > > h->hugetlb_next_nid = next_nid;
> > > return next_nid;
> > > }
> > > @@ -652,6 +652,11 @@ static int alloc_fresh_huge_page(struct
> > > int ret = 0;
> > >
> > > start_nid = h->hugetlb_next_nid;
> > > + /*
> > > + * we may have allocated with a different nodes_allowed previously
> > > + */
> > > + if (!node_isset(start_nid, *h->nodes_allowed))
> > > + start_nid = hstate_next_node(h);
> > >
> > > do {
> > > page = alloc_fresh_huge_page_node(h, h->hugetlb_next_nid);
> > > @@ -1169,20 +1174,28 @@ static inline void try_to_free_low(struc
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Increment or decrement surplus_huge_pages. Keep node-specific counters
> > > - * balanced by operating on them in a round-robin fashion.
> > > + * balanced by operating on them in a round-robin fashion. Use nodes_allowed
> > > + * mask when decreasing suplus pages as we're "promoting" them to persistent.
> >
> > s/suplus/surplus/
>
> ACK
>
> >
> > > + * Use node_online_map for increment surplus pages as we're demoting previously
> > > + * persistent huge pages.
> > > + * Called holding the hugetlb_lock.
> > > * Returns 1 if an adjustment was made.
> > > */
> > > static int adjust_pool_surplus(struct hstate *h, int delta)
> > > {
> > > + nodemask_t *nodemask = &node_online_map;
> > > static int prev_nid;
> > > int nid = prev_nid;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > >
> > > VM_BUG_ON(delta != -1 && delta != 1);
> > > + if (delta < 0)
> > > + nodemask = h->nodes_allowed;
> > > +
> >
> > Please spell out why nodes_allowed is only used when decreasing the surplus
> > count.
>
> I thought my addition to the comment block did that.
>
> My thinking: surplus pages are, by definition, in use, so the only time
> we decrease them via adjust_pool_surplus() is when we're increasing
> nr_hugepages. New "persistent" huge pages are masked by nodes_allowed,
> so promoting surplus pages to persistent should also be so masked.
>
This in addition to the existing comment is more than adequate.
> Conversely, since this series uses the node_online_mask for freeing
> available persistent huge pages, I mention that we use it for increasing
> the surplus page count.
>
> Should I add more to the comment?
>
Do please.
> >
> > > do {
> > > - nid = next_node(nid, node_online_map);
> > > + nid = next_node(nid, *nodemask);
> > > if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
> > > - nid = first_node(node_online_map);
> > > + nid = first_node(*nodemask);
> > >
> > > /* To shrink on this node, there must be a surplus page */
> > > if (delta < 0 && !h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid])
> > >
> >
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-18 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 13:52 [PATCH 0/5] Huge Pages Nodes Allowed Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-16 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] Free huge pages round robin to balance across nodes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17 13:18 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 17:16 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 19:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-16 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] Add nodes_allowed members to hugepages hstate struct Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17 13:35 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 17:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 9:17 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] Use per hstate nodes_allowed to constrain huge page allocation Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17 13:39 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 17:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 9:18 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] Add sysctl for default hstate nodes_allowed Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17 13:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 17:52 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 9:19 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] Update huge pages kernel documentation Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 18:49 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-18 19:06 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 0/5] Huge Pages Nodes Allowed Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 17:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 9:33 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-18 14:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 15:00 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-18 19:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-24 7:11 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-24 11:25 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-24 22:26 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-25 2:14 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-25 19:22 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090618091826.GB14903@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox