From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][BUGFIX] memcg: rmdir doesn't return
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:05:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617073521.GG7646@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617152748.6b6c643e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-06-17 15:27:48]:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:19:55 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-06-17 14:11:09]:
> >
> > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:26:43 +0530
> > > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-06-16 17:44:36]:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:48:20 +0900
> > > > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > It has been working well so far, but I will continue to test for more long time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you. I'd like to find out more clean fix, keeping this as an option.
> > > > > >
> > > > > This is cleaned up version. works well in following test.
> > > > >
> > > > > ==
> > > > > 1. mount -t tmpfs /dev/null /mnt/tmpfs
> > > > > 2. mount -t cgroup /dev/null /mnt/cgroups -o memory
> > > > > 3. mkdir /mnt/cgroups/A/
> > > > > 4. echo $$ > /mnt/cgroups/A/tasks
> > > > > 5. echo 4M > /mnt/cgroups/A/memory.limit_in_bytes
> > > > > 5. dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmpfs/testfile bs=1024 count=30000
> > > > > => 26M of swap.
> > > > > 6. echo $$ > /mnt/cgroups/tasks
> > > > > => group "A" is empty now.
> > > > > 7-a. while true; do cat /mnt/tmpfs/testfile > /dev/null;done
> > > > >
> > > > > In ohter shell.
> > > > > 7-b. rmdir /mnt/cgroups/A
> > > > > ==
> > > > > Of course, you have more compliated ones..
> > > > >
> > > > > the patch seems a bit long but most of patch is comment..
> > > > >
> > > > > ==
> > > > > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > In general, cgroup is for tasks and cgroup subsys(css)'s refcnt is maintained
> > > > > per objects related to tasks. But memcg counts refcnt per pages because
> > > > > the pointer to css is recorded per page. And more, hierarchy-management support
> > > > > requires safe css refcnt management while a rmdir() is ongoing.
> > > > >
> > > > > css_tryget()/css_put() is for such purpose and works well.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, frequent css_put()/get() tends to prevent rmdir() and users can see
> > > > > EBUSY very often. To fix that, waitqueue-for-rmdir was introduced and
> > > > > rmdir() can work in synchronous way with cgroup subsytems. But this logic
> > > > > expects "refcnt obtained by css_tryget() is temporal and will go down to
> > > > > 0 soon, then rmdir() will wake up soon."
> > > > >
> > > > > But memcg's swapin code breaks the assumption. (But necessary...)
> > > > > This patch try to reuse another anotation of CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR flag to
> > > > > check whether cgroup is under rmdir if memcg got a *not termporal* refcnt
> > > > > by css_tryget().
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > include/linux/cgroup.h | 7 +++++++
> > > > > kernel/cgroup.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > > > mm/memcontrol.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > > > > 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Index: linux-2.6.30.org/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > --- linux-2.6.30.org.orig/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > > > > +++ linux-2.6.30.org/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > > > > @@ -365,6 +365,13 @@ int cgroup_task_count(const struct cgrou
> > > > > /* Return true if cgrp is a descendant of the task's cgroup */
> > > > > int cgroup_is_descendant(const struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *task);
> > > > >
> > > > > +void __cgroup_wakeup_rmdir_waiters(const struct cgroup *cgrp);
> > > > > +static inline void cgroup_wakeup_rmdir_waiters(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + if (unlikely(test_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags)))
> > > > > + __cgroup_wakeup_rmdir_waiters(cgrp);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Control Group subsystem type.
> > > > > * See Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt for details
> > > > > Index: linux-2.6.30.org/kernel/cgroup.c
> > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > --- linux-2.6.30.org.orig/kernel/cgroup.c
> > > > > +++ linux-2.6.30.org/kernel/cgroup.c
> > > > > @@ -737,10 +737,9 @@ static void cgroup_d_remove_dir(struct d
> > > > > */
> > > > > DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(cgroup_rmdir_waitq);
> > > > >
> > > > > -static void cgroup_wakeup_rmdir_waiters(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> > > > > +void __cgroup_wakeup_rmdir_waiters(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - if (unlikely(test_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags)))
> > > > > - wake_up_all(&cgroup_rmdir_waitq);
> > > > > + wake_up_all(&cgroup_rmdir_waitq);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > static int rebind_subsystems(struct cgroupfs_root *root,
> > > > > @@ -2667,13 +2666,27 @@ static int cgroup_rmdir(struct inode *un
> > > > >
> > > > > /* the vfs holds both inode->i_mutex already */
> > > > > again:
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * css_put/get is provided for subsys to grab refcnt to css. In typical
> > > > > + * case, subsystem has no reference after pre_destroy(). But, under
> > > > > + * hierarchy management, some *temporal* refcnt can be hold.
> > > > > + * To avoid returning -EBUSY to a user, waitqueue is used. If subsys
> > > > > + * is really busy, it should return -EBUSY at pre_destroy(). wake_up
> > > > > + * is called when css_put() is called and refcnt goes down to 0.
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Subsys can check CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR bit by itself to know
> > > > > + * it's under ongoing rmdir() or not. Because css_tryget() returns false
> > > > > + * only after css->refcnt returns 0, checking this bit is useful when
> > > > > + * css' refcnt seems to be not temporal.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + set_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
> > > > > + prepare_to_wait(&cgroup_rmdir_waitq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > > > +
> > > > > mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > > > > - if (atomic_read(&cgrp->count) != 0) {
> > > > > - mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > > > > - return -EBUSY;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > - if (!list_empty(&cgrp->children)) {
> > > > > + if (atomic_read(&cgrp->count) != 0 || !list_empty(&cgrp->children)) {
> > > > > mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > > > > + finish_wait(&cgroup_rmdir_waitq, &wait);
> > > > > + clear_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
> > > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > > }
> > > > > mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > > > > @@ -2683,25 +2696,20 @@ again:
> > > > > * that rmdir() request comes.
> > > > > */
> > > > > ret = cgroup_call_pre_destroy(cgrp);
> > > > > - if (ret)
> > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > + finish_wait(&cgroup_rmdir_waitq, &wait);
> > > > > + clear_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > > > > parent = cgrp->parent;
> > > > > if (atomic_read(&cgrp->count) || !list_empty(&cgrp->children)) {
> > > > > mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > > > > + finish_wait(&cgroup_rmdir_waitq, &wait);
> > > > > + clear_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
> > > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > > }
> > > > > - /*
> > > > > - * css_put/get is provided for subsys to grab refcnt to css. In typical
> > > > > - * case, subsystem has no reference after pre_destroy(). But, under
> > > > > - * hierarchy management, some *temporal* refcnt can be hold.
> > > > > - * To avoid returning -EBUSY to a user, waitqueue is used. If subsys
> > > > > - * is really busy, it should return -EBUSY at pre_destroy(). wake_up
> > > > > - * is called when css_put() is called and refcnt goes down to 0.
> > > > > - */
> > > > > - set_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
> > > > > - prepare_to_wait(&cgroup_rmdir_waitq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!cgroup_clear_css_refs(cgrp)) {
> > > > > mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > > > > Index: linux-2.6.30.org/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > --- linux-2.6.30.org.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > > > +++ linux-2.6.30.org/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > > > @@ -1338,6 +1338,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct
> > > > > return;
> > > > > if (!ptr)
> > > > > return;
> > > > > + css_get(&ptr->css);
> > > > > pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> > > > > mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(page);
> > > > > __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(ptr, pc, ctype);
> > > > > @@ -1367,8 +1368,14 @@ __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct
> > > > > }
> > > > > rcu_read_unlock();
> > > > > }
> > > > > - /* add this page(page_cgroup) to the LRU we want. */
> > > > > -
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * Because we charged against a cgroup which is obtained by record
> > > > > + * in swap_cgroup, not by task, there is a possibility that someone is
> > > > > + * waiting for rmdir. This happens when a swap entry is shared
> > > > > + * among cgroups. After wakeup, pre_destroy() will be called again.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + cgroup_wakeup_rmdir_waiters(&ptr->css.cgroup);
> > > > > + css_put(&ptr->css);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > void mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am a little confused by the infrastructure. I think it is OK to
> > > > return -EBUSY and then use notify_on_release to figure out when to
> > > > free the cgroup. Are we moving away from the design?
> > > >
> > >
> > > When you use cgroup with _hierarchy_ in real world, rmdir returns -EBUSY very
> > > very often. (Because hierarchy dramatically increase chance to css_get() to empty
> > > cgroup.)
> > >
> >
> > I completely understand that part, but I thought we had solved this
> > problem through notify_on_release and release_agent. I am not against
> > it, but I want to know why release_agent will not solve this problem
> > (is it too loose for control?)
> >
>
> release_agent is not useful with memcg by following reason.
>
> 1. release_agent() is called when css->count get to be 0.
> 2. until force_empty() is called, css->count > 0.
> 3. to call force_empty, rmdir or memory.force_empty should be kicked.
> 4. Then, release_agent doesn't work for automatic rmdir.
>
> You have to change release_agent definition/implimentation to rmdir memcg's
> directory automatically.
>
> And even if release_agent() is called, it will do rmdir and see -EBUSY.
Because of hierarchy? But we need to cleanup hierarchy before rmdir()
no?
> I don't think multiple calls of release_agent against a cgroup is a sane
> activity.
>
> But under current implementation, release_agent can be called multiple times.
> (This is other topic, maybe.)
>
I was hoping to use release agent in the following manner
1. write a script to do a force_empty() followed by rmdir()
I am not against using the waitq, just seeing the top level design
implications and end user semantics as a result of the patch.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 5:33 Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-12 6:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-15 2:50 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-15 3:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-15 8:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-16 2:47 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-16 5:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-16 6:38 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-16 6:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-16 8:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-17 4:56 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-17 5:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-17 5:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-17 6:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-17 7:35 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-06-17 9:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-17 9:24 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-18 3:03 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-18 3:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617073521.GG7646@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox