From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD8E6B005A for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:58:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:00:19 +0100 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] HWPOISON: Intro (v5) Message-ID: <20090615140019.4e405d37@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20090615024520.786814520@intel.com> <4A35BD7A.9070208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090615042753.GA20788@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Wu Fengguang , Balbir Singh , Andrew Morton , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Mel Gorman , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Nick Piggin , Andi Kleen , "riel@redhat.com" , "chris.mason@oracle.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: > My opinion is that it's way too late for .31 - your only chance > is that Linus sometimes gets bored with playing safe, and decides > to break his rules and try something out regardless - but I'd hope > the bootmem business already sated his appetite for danger this time. I see no consensus on it being worth merging, no testing, no upstream integration shakedown, no builds on non-x86 boxes, no work with other arch maintainers who have similar abilities and needs. It belongs in next for a release or two while people work on it, while things like PPC64 can plumb into it if they wish and while people work out if its actually useful given that for most users it reduces the reliability of the services they are providing rather than improving it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org