From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
"linuxram@us.ibm.com" <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:26:10 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090611122206.591B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090610115944.GB5657@localhost>
> We are not talking about NR_TMPFS_PAGES, but NR_TMPFS_MAPPED :)
>
> We only need to account it in page_add_file_rmap() and page_remove_rmap(),
> I don't think they are too hot paths. And the relative cost is low enough.
>
> It will look like this.
>
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 +
> mm/rmap.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ enum zone_stat_item {
> NR_VMSCAN_WRITE,
> /* Second 128 byte cacheline */
> NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP, /* Writeback using temporary buffers */
> + NR_TMPFS_MAPPED,
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> NUMA_HIT, /* allocated in intended node */
> NUMA_MISS, /* allocated in non intended node */
> --- linux.orig/mm/rmap.c
> +++ linux/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -844,6 +844,8 @@ void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *pag
> {
> if (atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount)) {
> __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_MAPPED);
> + if (PageSwapBacked(page))
> + __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_TMPFS_MAPPED);
> mem_cgroup_update_mapped_file_stat(page, 1);
> }
> }
> @@ -894,6 +896,8 @@ void page_remove_rmap(struct page *page)
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
> __dec_zone_page_state(page,
> PageAnon(page) ? NR_ANON_PAGES : NR_FILE_MAPPED);
> + if (!PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page))
> + __dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_TMPFS_MAPPED);
> mem_cgroup_update_mapped_file_stat(page, -1);
> /*
> * It would be tidy to reset the PageAnon mapping here,
I think this patch looks good. thanks :)
but I have one request.
Could you please rename NR_FILE_MAPPED to NR_SWAP_BACKED_FILE_MAPPED?
I mean, mm/shmem isn't only used for tmpfs, but also be used ipc/shm and
/dev/zero.
NR_TMPFS_MAPPED seems a bit misleading.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 17:01 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:15 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 7:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:31 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 11:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 13:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 22:42 ` Ram Pai
2009-06-11 13:52 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 1:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-11 3:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:11 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:56 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 2:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 1:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 5:54 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 10:48 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090611122206.591B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox