From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
"linuxram@us.ibm.com" <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:31:49 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090610162926.DDC8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090610011939.GA5603@localhost>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 01:01:41AM +0800, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On NUMA machines, the administrator can configure zone_reclaim_mode that
> > is a more targetted form of direct reclaim. On machines with large NUMA
> > distances for example, a zone_reclaim_mode defaults to 1 meaning that clean
> > unmapped pages will be reclaimed if the zone watermarks are not being met.
> >
> > There is a heuristic that determines if the scan is worthwhile but the
> > problem is that the heuristic is not being properly applied and is basically
> > assuming zone_reclaim_mode is 1 if it is enabled.
> >
> > Historically, once enabled it was depending on NR_FILE_PAGES which may
> > include swapcache pages that the reclaim_mode cannot deal with. Patch
> > vmscan-change-the-number-of-the-unmapped-files-in-zone-reclaim.patch by
> > Kosaki Motohiro noted that zone_page_state(zone, NR_FILE_PAGES) included
> > pages that were not file-backed such as swapcache and made a calculation
> > based on the inactive, active and mapped files. This is far superior
> > when zone_reclaim==1 but if RECLAIM_SWAP is set, then NR_FILE_PAGES is a
> > reasonable starting figure.
> >
> > This patch alters how zone_reclaim() works out how many pages it might be
> > able to reclaim given the current reclaim_mode. If RECLAIM_SWAP is set
> > in the reclaim_mode it will either consider NR_FILE_PAGES as potential
> > candidates or else use NR_{IN}ACTIVE}_PAGES-NR_FILE_MAPPED to discount
> > swapcache and other non-file-backed pages. If RECLAIM_WRITE is not set,
> > then NR_FILE_DIRTY number of pages are not candidates. If RECLAIM_SWAP is
> > not set, then NR_FILE_MAPPED are not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 2ddcfc8..2bfc76e 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2333,6 +2333,41 @@ int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio = 1;
> > */
> > int sysctl_min_slab_ratio = 5;
> >
> > +static inline unsigned long zone_unmapped_file_pages(struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > + return zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) +
> > + zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) -
> > + zone_page_state(zone, NR_FILE_MAPPED);
>
> This may underflow if too many tmpfs pages are mapped.
sorry my fault.
I'm preparing updated patch.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 17:01 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:15 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 7:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-06-10 10:31 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 11:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 13:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 22:42 ` Ram Pai
2009-06-11 13:52 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 1:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-11 3:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:11 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:56 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 2:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 1:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 5:54 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 10:48 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090610162926.DDC8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox