linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	yanmin.zhang@intel.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:53:55 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090610105231.DDAC.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244566904-31470-5-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

> +
> +zone_reclaim_interval:
> +
> +The time allowed for off-node allocations after zone reclaim
> +has failed to reclaim enough pages to allow a local allocation.
> +
> +Time is set in seconds and set by default to 30 seconds.
> +
> +Reduce the interval if undesired off-node allocations occur or
> +set to 0 to always try and reclaim pages for node-local memory.
> +However, too frequent scans will have a negative impact on
> +off-node allocation performance and manifest as high CPU usage.
> +

good documentaion :)

	Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

 -kosaki



>  ============ End of Document =================================
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 8895985..3a53e1c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ struct zone {
>  	atomic_long_t		vm_stat[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS];
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * timestamp (in jiffies) of the last zone_reclaim that scanned
> +	 * but failed to free enough pages. This is used to avoid repeated
> +	 * scans when zone_reclaim() is unable to detect in advance that
> +	 * the scanning is useless. This can happen for example if a zone
> +	 * has large numbers of clean unmapped file pages on tmpfs
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long		zone_reclaim_failure;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * prev_priority holds the scanning priority for this zone.  It is
>  	 * defined as the scanning priority at which we achieved our reclaim
>  	 * target at the previous try_to_free_pages() or balance_pgdat()
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index c88b366..28a01e3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ extern long vm_total_pages;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>  extern int zone_reclaim_mode;
> +extern int zone_reclaim_interval;
>  extern int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio;
>  extern int sysctl_min_slab_ratio;
>  extern int zone_reclaim(struct zone *, gfp_t, unsigned int);
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 0554886..2afffa5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -1221,6 +1221,15 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
>  		.extra1		= &zero,
>  	},
>  	{
> +		.ctl_name       = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
> +		.procname       = "zone_reclaim_interval",
> +		.data           = &zone_reclaim_interval,
> +		.maxlen         = sizeof(zone_reclaim_interval),
> +		.mode           = 0644,
> +		.proc_handler   = &proc_dointvec_jiffies,
> +		.strategy       = &sysctl_jiffies,
> +	},
> +	{
>  		.ctl_name	= VM_MIN_UNMAPPED,
>  		.procname	= "min_unmapped_ratio",
>  		.data		= &sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio,
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 8be4582..5fa4843 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2315,6 +2315,13 @@ int zone_reclaim_mode __read_mostly;
>  #define RECLAIM_SWAP (1<<2)	/* Swap pages out during reclaim */
>  
>  /*
> + * Minimum time between zone_reclaim() scans that failed. Ordinarily, a
> + * scan will not fail because it will be determined in advance if it can
> + * succeeed but this does not always work. See mmzone.h
> + */
> +int zone_reclaim_interval __read_mostly = 30*HZ;
> +
> +/*
>   * Priority for ZONE_RECLAIM. This determines the fraction of pages
>   * of a node considered for each zone_reclaim. 4 scans 1/16th of
>   * a zone.
> @@ -2464,6 +2471,15 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>  	    zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) <= zone->min_slab_pages)
>  		return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
>  
> +	/* Watch for jiffie wraparound */
> +	if (unlikely(jiffies < zone->zone_reclaim_failure))
> +		zone->zone_reclaim_failure = jiffies;
> +
> +	/* Do not attempt a scan if scanning failed recently */
> +	if (time_before(jiffies,
> +			zone->zone_reclaim_failure + zone_reclaim_interval))
> +		return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
> +
>  	if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
>  		return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
>  
> @@ -2491,6 +2507,14 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>  
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		count_vm_events(PGSCAN_ZONERECLAIM_FAILED, 1);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We were unable to reclaim enough pages to stay on node and
> +		 * unable to detect in advance that the scan would fail. Allow
> +		 * off node accesses for zone_reclaim_inteval jiffies before
> +		 * trying zone_reclaim() again
> +		 */
> +		zone->zone_reclaim_failure = jiffies;
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;
> -- 
> 1.5.6.5
> 



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-10  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-09 17:01 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:15   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10  1:19   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10  7:31     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:31     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 11:59       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 13:41         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 22:42           ` Ram Pai
2009-06-11 13:52             ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11  1:29           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-11  3:26         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:11   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10  1:52   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:56   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10  1:47   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:36     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10  2:10   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 10:40     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA Mel Gorman
2009-06-10  1:53   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-06-10  5:54   ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 10:48     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090610105231.DDAC.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox