From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Matthew Von Maszewski <matthew@thehive.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: huge mem mmap eats all CPU when multiple processes
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:41:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609094117.8226c0ca.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8FDBF172-AAA8-4737-A6C6-50B468CA0CBF@thehive.com>
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:27:49 -0400
Matthew Von Maszewski <matthew@thehive.com> wrote:
> [note: not on kernel mailing list, please cc author]
>
> Symptom: 9 processes mmap same 2 Gig memory section for a shared C
> heap (lots of random access). All process begin extreme CPU load in
> top.
>
> - Same code works well when only single process access huge mem.
Does this "huge mem" means HugeTLB(2M/4Mbytes) pages ?
> - Code works well with standard vm based mmap file and 9 processes.
>
What is sys/user ratio in top ? Almost all cpus are used by "sys" ?
> Environment:
>
> - Intel x86_64: Dual core Xeon with hyperthreading (4 logical
> processors)
> - 6 Gig ram, 2.5G allocated to huge mem
by boot option ?
> - tried with kernels 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30-rc8
> - following mmap() call has base address as NULL on first process,
> then returned address passed to subsequent processes (not threads,
> processes)
>
> m_MemSize=((m_MemSize/(2048*1024))+1)*2048*1024;
> m_BaseAddr=mmap(m_File->GetFixedBase(), m_MemSize,
> (PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE),
> MAP_SHARED, m_File->GetFileId(), m_Offset);
>
>
> I am not a kernel hacker so I have not attempted to debug. Will be
> able to spend time on a sample program for sharing later today or
> tomorrow. Sending this note now in case this is already known.
>
IIUC, all page faults to hugetlb are serialized by system's mutex. Then, touching
in parallel doesn't do fast job..
Then, I wonder touching all necessary maps by one thread is good, in general.
> Don't suppose this is as simple as a Copy-On-Write flag being set wrong?
>
I don't think, so.
> Please send notes as to things I need to capture to better describe
> this bug. Happy to do the work.
>
Add cc to linux-mm.
Thanks,
-Kame
> Thanks,
> Matthew
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8FDBF172-AAA8-4737-A6C6-50B468CA0CBF@thehive.com>
2009-06-09 0:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-06-09 14:16 ` Matthew Von Maszewski
2009-06-09 19:14 ` Matthew Von Maszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090609094117.8226c0ca.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew@thehive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox