From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] swap: virtual swap readahead
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:58:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090608175808.GD7563@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090608075246.GA12644@localhost>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:52:46PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 05:05:46PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > The current swap readahead implementation reads a physically
> > contiguous group of swap slots around the faulting page to take
> > advantage of the disk head's position and in the hope that the
> > surrounding pages will be needed soon as well.
> >
> > This works as long as the physical swap slot order approximates the
> > LRU order decently, otherwise it wastes memory and IO bandwidth to
> > read in pages that are unlikely to be needed soon.
> >
> > However, the physical swap slot layout diverges from the LRU order
> > with increasing swap activity, i.e. high memory pressure situations,
> > and this is exactly the situation where swapin should not waste any
> > memory or IO bandwidth as both are the most contended resources at
> > this point.
> >
> > This patch makes swap-in base its readaround window on the virtual
> > proximity of pages in the faulting VMA, as an indicator for pages
> > needed in the near future, while still taking physical locality of
> > swap slots into account.
> >
> > This has the advantage of reading in big batches when the LRU order
> > matches the swap slot order while automatically throttling readahead
> > when the system is thrashing and swap slots are no longer nicely
> > grouped by LRU order.
>
> Hi Johannes,
>
> You may want to test the patch against a real desktop :)
> The attached scripts can do that. I also have the setup to
> test it out conveniently, so if you send me the latest patch..
Thanks a bunch for the offer! I'm just now incorporating Hugh's
feedback and hope I will be back soon with the next version. I will
let you know, for sure.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-27 15:05 Johannes Weiner
2009-05-27 17:32 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-27 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 0:14 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-06-01 8:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-08 7:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-08 17:58 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090608175808.GD7563@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox