linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	starlight@binnacle.cx, Eric B Munson <ebmunson@us.ibm.com>,
	Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	wli@movementarian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Ignore VM_LOCKED when determining if hugetlb-backed page tables can be shared or not
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:55:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528085503.GB10334@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090527231803.GA30002@elte.hu>

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:18:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> 
> > On x86 and x86-64, it is possible that page tables are shared 
> > beween shared mappings backed by hugetlbfs. As part of this, 
> > page_table_shareable() checks a pair of vma->vm_flags and they 
> > must match if they are to be shared. All VMA flags are taken into 
> > account, including VM_LOCKED.
> > 
> > The problem is that VM_LOCKED is cleared on fork(). When a process 
> > with a shared memory segment forks() to exec() a helper, there 
> > will be shared VMAs with different flags. The impact is that the 
> > shared segment is sometimes considered shareable and other times 
> > not, depending on what process is checking.
> > 
> > What happens is that the segment page tables are being shared but 
> > the count is inaccurate depending on the ordering of events. As 
> > the page tables are freed with put_page(), bad pmd's are found 
> > when some of the children exit. The hugepage counters also get 
> > corrupted and the Total and Free count will no longer match even 
> > when all the hugepage-backed regions are freed. This requires a 
> > reboot of the machine to "fix".
> > 
> > This patch addresses the problem by comparing all flags except 
> > VM_LOCKED when deciding if pagetables should be shared or not for 
> > hugetlbfs-backed mapping.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c |    6 +++++-
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> i suspect it would be best to do this due -mm, due to the (larger) 
> mm/hugetlb.c cross section, right?
> 

I'm happy with that approach. Almost all hugetlbfs-related patches have
gone through -mm to date AFAIK even when they have been arch specific
like this.

Thanks

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-28  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-27 11:12 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for hugetlbfs-related problems on shared memory Mel Gorman
2009-05-27 11:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Ignore VM_LOCKED when determining if hugetlb-backed page tables can be shared or not Mel Gorman
2009-05-27 16:38   ` Eric B Munson
2009-05-27 23:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-28  8:55     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-05-27 11:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Account for MAP_SHARED mappings using VM_MAYSHARE and not VM_SHARED in hugetlbfs Mel Gorman
2009-05-27 16:40   ` Eric B Munson
2009-05-27 20:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for hugetlbfs-related problems on shared memory Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 23:19   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16  0:19     ` QUESTION: can netdev_alloc_skb() errors be reduced by tuning? starlight
2009-06-16  2:26       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-16  4:12         ` starlight
2009-06-16  6:12           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-05  3:44             ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-16  9:19       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 15:25         ` starlight
2009-05-28  8:56   ` [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for hugetlbfs-related problems on shared memory Mel Gorman
2009-06-08  1:25 ` starlight
2009-06-08 10:24   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090528085503.GB10334@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=ebmunson@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=starlight@binnacle.cx \
    --cc=wli@movementarian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox