linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com,
	cl@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
	dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux@dominikbrodowski.net, mingo@elte.hu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][mmtom] clean up printk_once of get_cpu_vendor
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:31:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090527083131.7e2d161d.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090526134134.bb3e1e23.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, 26 May 2009 13:41:34 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 May 2009 15:59:43 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009 15:52:32 +0900 (JST)
> > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > == CUT HERE ==
> > > > 
> > > > There are some places to be able to use printk_once instead of hard coding.
> > > > 
> > > > It will help code readability and maintenance.
> > > > This patch doesn't change function's behavior.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> > > > CC: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
> > > > CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c  |    8 ++------
> > > >  drivers/net/3c515.c           |    7 ++-----
> > > >  drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_ioctl.c |    9 +++------
> > > >  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Please separete to three patches ;)
> > 
> > After I listen about things I missed, I will repost it at all once with each patch.
> 
> Yes, that would be better.  But for a trivial little patch like this I
> expect we can just merge it and move on.  But please do split up these
> multi-subsystem patches in future.

Thanks. Andrew. 
I confiremd what you merged. 

I modifed get_cpu_vendor's printk-once by Pavel Machek's adivse.
Please, merge with this based on my previous version.

== CUT HERE ==

[PATCH] clean up printk_once of get_cpu_vendor

It remove unnecessary variable and change two static variable
with one.

Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index dc0f694..c6feb68 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -479,7 +479,6 @@ out:
 static void __cpuinit get_cpu_vendor(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	char *v = c->x86_vendor_id;
-	static int printed;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < X86_VENDOR_NUM; i++) {
@@ -497,8 +496,8 @@ static void __cpuinit get_cpu_vendor(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 
 	printk_once(KERN_ERR
-		    "CPU: vendor_id '%s' unknown, using generic init.\n", v);
-	printk_once(KERN_ERR "CPU: Your system may be unstable.\n");
+			"CPU: vendor_id '%s' unknown, using generic init.\n" \
+			"CPU: Your system may be unstable.\n", v);
 
 	c->x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN;
 	this_cpu = &default_cpu;
-- 
1.5.4.3








-- 
Kinds Regards
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-26 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-26  4:57 [PATCH][mmtom] clean up once printk routine Minchan Kim
2009-05-26  6:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-26  6:59   ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-26 20:41     ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:31       ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-05-26  8:35 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-26  9:40   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090527083131.7e2d161d.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox