From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F6D06B004D for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 22:56:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.71]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n4J2vdKg024932 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:40 +0900 Received: from smail (m1 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9A345DD74 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.91]) by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9034345DD72 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878161DB8012 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from m105.s.css.fujitsu.com (m105.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.105]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122C51DB8013 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:39 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default In-Reply-To: <20090519102634.4EB4.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090518034907.GF5869@localhost> <20090519102634.4EB4.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20090519115645.4EB7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:38 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Wu Fengguang , LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Christoph Lameter , "Zhang, Yanmin" List-ID: nit fix. > In general, the feature of workload depended don't fit default option. > we can't know end-user run what workload anyway. > > Fortunately (or Unfortunately), typical workload and machine size had typical workload and machine size and remote node distance > significant mutuality. > Thus, the current default setting calculation had worked well in past days. > > Now, it was breaked. What should we do? > > > > Yanmin, We know 99% linux people use intel cpu and you are one of > most hard repeated testing guy in lkml and you have much test. > May I ask your tested machine and benchmark? > > if zone_reclaim=0 tendency workload is much than zone_reclaim=1 tendency workload, > we can drop our afraid and we would prioritize your opinion, of cource. > > thanks. > > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org