From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <m-kosaki@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v2)
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:11:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090518191107.8a7cc990.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090515181639.GH4451@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:46:39 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-05-16 02:45:03]:
>
> > Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > Feature: Remove the overhead associated with the root cgroup
> > >
> > > From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > This patch changes the memory cgroup and removes the overhead associated
> > > with LRU maintenance of all pages in the root cgroup. As a side-effect, we
> > > can
> > > no longer set a memory hard limit in the root cgroup.
> > >
> > > A new flag is used to track page_cgroup associated with the root cgroup
> > > pages. A new flag to track whether the page has been accounted or not
> > > has been added as well.
> > >
> > > Review comments higly appreciated
> > >
> > > Tests
> > >
> > > 1. Tested with allocate, touch and limit test case for a non-root cgroup
> > > 2. For the root cgroup tested performance impact with reaim
> > >
> > >
> > > +patch mmtom-08-may-2009
> > > AIM9 1362.93 1338.17
> > > Dbase 17457.75 16021.58
> > > New Dbase 18070.18 16518.54
> > > Shared 9681.85 8882.11
> > > Compute 16197.79 15226.13
> > >
> > Hmm, at first impression, I can't convice the numbers...
> > Just avoiding list_add/del makes programs _10%_ faster ?
> > Could you show changes in cpu cache-miss late if you can ?
> > (And why Aim9 goes bad ?)
>
> OK... I'll try but I am away on travel for 3 weeks :( you can try and run
> this as well
>
tested aim7 with some config.
CPU: Xeon 3.1GHz/4Core x2 (8cpu)
Memory: 32G
HDD: Usual? Scsi disk (just 1 disk)
(try_to_free_pages() etc...will never be called.)
Multiuser config. #of tasks 1100 (near to peak on my host)
10runs.
rc6mm1 score(Jobs/min)
44009.1 44844.5 44691.1 43981.9 44992.6
44544.9 44179.1 44283.0 44442.9 45033.8 average=44500
+patch
44656.8 44270.8 44706.7 44106.1 44467.6
44585.3 44167.0 44756.7 44853.9 44249.4 average=44482
Dbase config. #of tasks 25
rc6mm1 score (jobs/min)
11022.7 11018.9 11037.9 11003.8 11087.5
11145.2 11133.6 11068.3 11091.3 11106.6 average=11071
+patch
10888.0 10973.7 10913.9 11000.0 10984.9
10996.2 10969.9 10921.3 10921.3 11053.1 average=10962
Hmm, 1% improvement ?
(I think this is reasonable score of the effect of this patch)
Anyway, I'm afraid of difference between mine and your kernel config.
plz enjoy your travel for now :)
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-15 17:45 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-05-15 18:16 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-18 10:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-05-18 10:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-18 16:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-05-19 13:18 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-31 23:51 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-01 23:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-05 5:31 ` Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v3) Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 5:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-05 9:33 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-08 0:20 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-05 6:05 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-05 9:47 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-08 0:03 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-05 6:43 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-14 18:37 ` Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v4) Balbir Singh
2009-06-15 2:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-15 2:18 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-15 2:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-15 2:44 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-15 3:00 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-15 3:09 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-15 3:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-15 3:46 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-15 4:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-17 4:15 ` [RFC] Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v2) Balbir Singh
2009-06-01 4:25 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-01 5:01 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-06-01 5:49 ` Balbir Singh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-15 15:18 Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090518191107.8a7cc990.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=m-kosaki@ceres.dti.ne.jp \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox