Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix stale swap cache account leak in memcg v7

[Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>]

On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:54:45 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:38:53 +0900
> Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:47:16 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 May 2009 09:31:27 +0900
> > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:21:58 +0530
> > > > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > The patch set includes followng
> > > > > >  [1/3] add mem_cgroup_is_activated() function. which tell us memcg is _really_ used.
> > > > > >  [2/3] fix swap cache handling race by avoidng readahead.
> > > > > >  [3/3] fix swap cache handling race by check swapcount again.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Result is good under my test.
> > > > > 
> > > > > What was the result (performance data impact) of disabling swap
> > > > > readahead? Otherwise, this looks the most reasonable set of patches
> > > > > for this problem.
> > > > > 
> > > > I'll measure some and report it in the next post.
> > > > 
> > > I confirmed there are cases which swapin readahead works very well....
> > > 
> > > Nishimura-san, could you post a patch for fixing leak at writeback ? as [3/3]
> > > I'd like to fix readahead case...with some large patch.
> > > 
> > Sure.
> > I'll rebase my patch onto [1-2/3] of your new patch and post it.
> > 
> Ah, plz go ahead and don't wait for me. Mine is just under rough design now.
> 
I see.

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>