From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF5DA6B004F for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:30:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n3LAVPJI031770 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:31:25 +0900 Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F268745DE76 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:31:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DC245DE71 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:31:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9D71DB8046 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:31:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.104]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2C61DB803C for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:31:24 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/25] Remove a branch by assuming __GFP_HIGH == ALLOC_HIGH In-Reply-To: <20090421180757.F145.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1240266011-11140-13-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <20090421180757.F145.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20090421193030.F16B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:31:23 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Mel Gorman Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Linux Memory Management List , Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lin Ming , Zhang Yanmin , Peter Zijlstra , Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton List-ID: > > @@ -1639,8 +1639,8 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask) > > * policy or is asking for __GFP_HIGH memory. GFP_ATOMIC requests will > > * set both ALLOC_HARDER (!wait) and ALLOC_HIGH (__GFP_HIGH). > > */ > > - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH) > > - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGH; > > + VM_BUG_ON(__GFP_HIGH != ALLOC_HIGH); Oops, I forgot said one comment. BUILD_BUG_ON() is better? > > + alloc_flags |= (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH); > > > > if (!wait) { > > alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER; > > Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > > > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org