From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/25] Break up the allocator entry point into fast and slow paths
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:44:00 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090421191918.F165.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421092912.GJ12713@csn.ul.ie>
> > >
> > > - /* This allocation should allow future memory freeing. */
> > > -
> > > -rebalance:
> > > - if (((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) || unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
> > > - && !in_interrupt()) {
> > > - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) {
> > > -nofail_alloc:
> > > - /* go through the zonelist yet again, ignoring mins */
> > > - page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, nodemask, order,
> > > - zonelist, high_zoneidx, ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS);
> > > - if (page)
> > > - goto got_pg;
> > > - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
> > > - congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/50);
> > > - goto nofail_alloc;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > - goto nopage;
> > > - }
> > > + /* Allocate without watermarks if the context allows */
> > > + if (is_allocation_high_priority(p, gfp_mask))
> > > + page = __alloc_pages_high_priority(gfp_mask, order,
> > > + zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask);
> > > + if (page)
> > > + goto got_pg;
> > >
> > > /* Atomic allocations - we can't balance anything */
> > > if (!wait)
> > > goto nopage;
> > >
> >
> > old code is below.
> > if PF_MEMALLOC and !in_interrupt() and __GFP_NOMEMALLOC case,
> > old code jump to nopage, your one call reclaim.
> >
> > I think, if the task have PF_MEMALLOC, it shouldn't call reclaim.
> > if not, endless reclaim recursion happend.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > rebalance:
> > if (((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) || unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
> > && !in_interrupt()) {
> > if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) {
> > nofail_alloc:
> > /* go through the zonelist yet again, ignoring mins */
> > page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, nodemask, order,
> > zonelist, high_zoneidx, ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS);
> > if (page)
> > goto got_pg;
> > if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
> > congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/50);
> > goto nofail_alloc;
> > }
> > }
> > goto nopage;
> > }
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> I altered the modified version to look like
>
> static inline int
> is_allocation_high_priority(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> if (((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) || unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
> && !in_interrupt())
> return 1;
> return 0;
> }
>
> Note the check to __GFP_NOMEMALLOC is no longer there.
>
> ....
>
> /* Allocate without watermarks if the context allows */
> if (is_allocation_high_priority(p, gfp_mask)) {
> /* Do not dip into emergency reserves if specified */
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) {
> page = __alloc_pages_high_priority(gfp_mask, order,
> zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask);
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
> }
>
> /* Ensure no recursion into the allocator */
> goto nopage;
> }
>
>
> Is that better?
nice.
> > > /* Atomic allocations - we can't balance anything */
> > > if (!wait)
> > > goto nopage;
> > >
> > > - cond_resched();
> > > -
> > > - /* We now go into synchronous reclaim */
> > > - cpuset_memory_pressure_bump();
> > > -
> > > - p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> > > -
> > > - lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
> > > - reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
> > > - p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> > > -
> > > - did_some_progress = try_to_free_pages(zonelist, order,
> > > - gfp_mask, nodemask);
> > > -
> > > - p->reclaim_state = NULL;
> > > - lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
> > > - p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
> > > -
> > > - cond_resched();
> > > + /* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
> > > + page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order,
> > > + zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> > > + nodemask,
> > > + alloc_flags, &did_some_progress);
> > > + if (page)
> > > + goto got_pg;
> > >
> > > - if (order != 0)
> > > - drain_all_pages();
> > > + /*
> > > + * If we failed to make any progress reclaiming, then we are
> > > + * running out of options and have to consider going OOM
> > > + */
> > > + if (!did_some_progress) {
> > > + if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)) {
> > > + page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order,
> > > + zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> > > + nodemask);
> > > + if (page)
> > > + goto got_pg;
> >
> > the old code here.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > } else if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)) {
> > if (!try_set_zone_oom(zonelist, gfp_mask)) {
> > schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> > goto restart;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > * Go through the zonelist yet one more time, keep
> > * very high watermark here, this is only to catch
> > * a parallel oom killing, we must fail if we're still
> > * under heavy pressure.
> > */
> > page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask|__GFP_HARDWALL, nodemask,
> > order, zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> > ALLOC_WMARK_HIGH|ALLOC_CPUSET);
> > if (page) {
> > clear_zonelist_oom(zonelist, gfp_mask);
> > goto got_pg;
> > }
> >
> > /* The OOM killer will not help higher order allocs so fail */
> > if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
> > clear_zonelist_oom(zonelist, gfp_mask);
> > goto nopage;
> > }
> >
> > out_of_memory(zonelist, gfp_mask, order);
> > clear_zonelist_oom(zonelist, gfp_mask);
> > goto restart;
> > }
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > if get_page_from_freelist() return NULL and order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER,
> > old code jump to nopage, your one jump to restart.
> >
>
> Good spot. The new section now looks like
>
> page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order,
> zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> nodemask);
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
>
> /*
> * The OOM killer does not trigger for high-order allocations
> * but if no progress is being made, there are no other
> * options and retrying is unlikely to help
> */
> if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> goto nopage;
>
> Better?
very good.
> > > - /*
> > > - * Don't let big-order allocations loop unless the caller explicitly
> > > - * requests that. Wait for some write requests to complete then retry.
> > > - *
> > > - * In this implementation, order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> > > - * means __GFP_NOFAIL, but that may not be true in other
> > > - * implementations.
> > > - *
> > > - * For order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, if __GFP_REPEAT is
> > > - * specified, then we retry until we no longer reclaim any pages
> > > - * (above), or we've reclaimed an order of pages at least as
> > > - * large as the allocation's order. In both cases, if the
> > > - * allocation still fails, we stop retrying.
> > > - */
> > > + /* Check if we should retry the allocation */
> > > pages_reclaimed += did_some_progress;
> > > - do_retry = 0;
> > > - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)) {
> > > - if (order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
> > > - do_retry = 1;
> > > - } else {
> > > - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT &&
> > > - pages_reclaimed < (1 << order))
> > > - do_retry = 1;
> > > - }
> > > - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> > > - do_retry = 1;
> > > - }
> > > - if (do_retry) {
> > > + if (should_alloc_retry(gfp_mask, order, pages_reclaimed)) {
> > > + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */
> > > congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/50);
> > > - goto rebalance;
> > > + goto restart;
> >
> > this change rebalance to restart.
> >
>
> True, it's makes more sense to me sensible to goto restart at that point
> after waiting on IO to complete but it's a functional change and doesn't
> belong in this patch. I've fixed it up.
>
> Very well spotted.
excellent.
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 22:19 [PATCH 00/25] Cleanup and optimise the page allocator V6 Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 01/25] Replace __alloc_pages_internal() with __alloc_pages_nodemask() Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 1:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 5:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 02/25] Do not sanity check order in the fast path Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 1:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 5:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 03/25] Do not check NUMA node ID when the caller knows the node is valid Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 6:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 6:33 ` Paul Mundt
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 04/25] Check only once if the zonelist is suitable for the allocation Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 3:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 7:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 05/25] Break up the allocator entry point into fast and slow paths Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 6:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 7:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 9:30 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 9:29 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 10:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 06/25] Move check for disabled anti-fragmentation out of fastpath Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 6:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 07/25] Check in advance if the zonelist needs additional filtering Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 6:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 9:47 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 08/25] Calculate the preferred zone for allocation only once Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 8:23 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 8:27 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 8:29 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 09/25] Calculate the migratetype " Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 8:35 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 10:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 10/25] Calculate the alloc_flags " Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 9:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 10:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 10:37 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 10:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 11/25] Calculate the cold parameter " Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 8:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 9:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 14:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-21 14:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 12/25] Remove a branch by assuming __GFP_HIGH == ALLOC_HIGH Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 8:45 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 10:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 9:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 10:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:19 ` [PATCH 13/25] Inline __rmqueue_smallest() Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 8:48 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 9:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 10:11 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 10:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 14/25] Inline buffered_rmqueue() Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 9:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 15/25] Inline __rmqueue_fallback() Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 9:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 16/25] Save text by reducing call sites of __rmqueue() Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 10:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 17/25] Do not call get_pageblock_migratetype() more than necessary Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 11:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 16:12 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-22 2:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 18/25] Do not disable interrupts in free_page_mlock() Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 7:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 8:50 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-22 0:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-22 14:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 19/25] Do not setup zonelist cache when there is only one node Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 20/25] Do not check for compound pages during the page allocator sanity checks Mel Gorman
2009-04-22 0:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-22 10:09 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-22 10:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 21/25] Use allocation flags as an index to the zone watermark Mel Gorman
2009-04-22 0:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-22 0:41 ` David Rientjes
2009-04-22 10:21 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-22 10:23 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 22/25] Update NR_FREE_PAGES only as necessary Mel Gorman
2009-04-22 0:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 23/25] Get the pageblock migratetype without disabling interrupts Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 24/25] Re-sort GFP flags and fix whitespace alignment for easier reading Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 8:04 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 8:52 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 15:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-21 15:24 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-20 22:20 ` [PATCH 25/25] Use a pre-calculated value instead of num_online_nodes() in fast paths Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 8:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-21 9:01 ` Mel Gorman
2009-04-21 15:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH 00/25] Cleanup and optimise the page allocator V6 Pekka Enberg
2009-04-22 14:13 ` Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-20 10:02 [PATCH 00/25] Cleanup and optimise the page allocator V5 Mel Gorman
2009-03-20 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/25] Break up the allocator entry point into fast and slow paths Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090421191918.F165.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox