From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3][rfc] vmscan: batched swap slot allocation
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:54:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090421095429.GB3639@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421182331.5c96615e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:23:31PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:52:31 +0200
> Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> > > Keeping multiple pages locked while they stay on private list ?
> >
> > Yeah, it's a bit suboptimal but I don't see a way around it.
> >
> Hmm, seems to increase stale swap cache dramatically under memcg ;)
Hmpf, not good.
> > > BTW, isn't it better to add "allocate multiple swap space at once" function
> > > like
> > > - void get_swap_pages(nr, swp_entry_array[])
> > > ? "nr" will not be bigger than SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX.
> >
> > It will sometimes be, see __zone_reclaim().
> >
> Hm ? If I read the code correctly, __zone_reclaim() just call shrink_zone() and
> "nr" to shrink_page_list() is SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, at most.
shrink_zone() and shrink_inactive_list() use whatever is set in
sc->swap_cluster_max and for __zone_reclaim() this is:
.swap_cluster_max = max_t(unsigned long, nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX is 32 (2^5), so if you have an order 6 allocation
doing reclaim, you end up with sc->swap_cluster_max == 64 already.
Not common, but it happens.
> > I had such a function once. The interesting part is: how and when do
> > you call it? If you drop the page lock in between, you need to redo
> > the checks for unevictability and whether the page has become mapped
> > etc.
> >
> > You also need to have the pages in swap cache as soon as possible or
> > optimistic swap-in will 'steal' your swap slots. See add_to_swap()
> > when the cache radix tree says -EEXIST.
> >
>
> If I was you, modify "offset" calculation of
> get_swap_pages()
> -> scan_swap_map()
> to allow that a cpu tends to find countinous swap page cluster.
> Too difficult ?
This goes in the direction of extent-based allocations. I tried that
once by providing every reclaimer with a cookie that is passed in for
swap allocations and used to find per-reclaimer offsets.
Something went wrong, I can not quite remember. Will have another
look at this.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 20:24 [patch 1/3] mm: fix pageref leak in do_swap_page() Johannes Weiner
2009-04-20 20:24 ` [patch 2/3][rfc] swap: try to reuse freed slots in the allocation area Johannes Weiner
2009-04-22 19:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-27 8:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-20 20:24 ` [patch 3/3][rfc] vmscan: batched swap slot allocation Johannes Weiner
2009-04-20 20:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-20 20:53 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-20 21:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-21 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 8:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-21 9:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 9:54 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2009-04-21 9:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-21 9:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-21 9:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-22 20:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-27 7:46 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-20 23:36 ` [patch 1/3] mm: fix pageref leak in do_swap_page() Minchan Kim
2009-04-21 3:14 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-21 8:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-21 8:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-21 3:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090421095429.GB3639@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox