From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA07C5F0001 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:12:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.71]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n3F4CwFB007642 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:12:58 +0900 Received: from smail (m1 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACFD45DD72 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:12:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.91]) by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4EF45DD76 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:12:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA0AE08007 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:12:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from m107.s.css.fujitsu.com (m107.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.107]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A10B1DB8014 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:12:57 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: meminfo Committed_AS underflows In-Reply-To: <20090415105033.AC29.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1239737619.32604.118.camel@nimitz> <20090415105033.AC29.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20090415131009.AC40.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:12:56 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Dave Hansen Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Eric B Munson , Mel Gorman , Christoph Lameter List-ID: fix stupid mistake. Changelog: since v1 - change the type of commited value from ulong to long ========================= Subject: [PATCH v2] fix Commited_AS underflow Dave Hansen reported committed_AS field can underfolow. > # while true; do cat /proc/meminfo | grep _AS; sleep 1; done | uniq -c > 1 Committed_AS: 18446744073709323392 kB > 11 Committed_AS: 18446744073709455488 kB > 6 Committed_AS: 35136 kB > 5 Committed_AS: 18446744073709454400 kB > 7 Committed_AS: 35904 kB > 3 Committed_AS: 18446744073709453248 kB > 2 Committed_AS: 34752 kB > 9 Committed_AS: 18446744073709453248 kB > 8 Committed_AS: 34752 kB > 3 Committed_AS: 18446744073709320960 kB > 7 Committed_AS: 18446744073709454080 kB > 3 Committed_AS: 18446744073709320960 kB > 5 Committed_AS: 18446744073709454080 kB > 6 Committed_AS: 18446744073709320960 kB Because NR_CPU can be greater than 1000. and meminfo_proc_show() doesn't have underflow check. this patch have two change. 1. Change NR_CPU to nr_online_cpus() vm_acct_memory() isn't fast-path. then cpumask_weight() calculation isn't so expensive and the parameter for scalability issue should consider number of _physical_ cpus. not theoretical maximum number. 2. Add under-flow check to meminfo_proc_show(). Almost field in /proc/meminfo have underflow check. but Committed_AS is significant exeption. it should do. Reported-by: Dave Hansen Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro --- fs/proc/meminfo.c | 4 +++- mm/swap.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: b/fs/proc/meminfo.c =================================================================== --- a/fs/proc/meminfo.c +++ b/fs/proc/meminfo.c @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ void __attribute__((weak)) arch_report_m static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { struct sysinfo i; - unsigned long committed; + long committed; unsigned long allowed; struct vmalloc_info vmi; long cached; @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_ si_meminfo(&i); si_swapinfo(&i); committed = atomic_long_read(&vm_committed_space); + if (committed < 0) + committed = 0; allowed = ((totalram_pages - hugetlb_total_pages()) * sysctl_overcommit_ratio / 100) + total_swap_pages; Index: b/mm/swap.c =================================================================== --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagevec_lookup_tag); * We tolerate a little inaccuracy to avoid ping-ponging the counter between * CPUs */ -#define ACCT_THRESHOLD max(16, NR_CPUS * 2) +#define ACCT_THRESHOLD max_t(long, 16, num_online_cpus() * 2) static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, committed_space); -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org