From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/9] soft limit queue and priority
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:55:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090407085555.a8818209.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090406110534.GJ7082@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:35:34 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-04-03 17:12:48]:
>
> > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > Softlimitq. for memcg.
> >
> > Implements an array of queue to list memcgs, array index is determined by
> > the amount of memory usage excess the soft limit.
> >
> > While Balbir's one uses RB-tree and my old one used a per-zone queue
> > (with round-robin), this is one of mixture of them.
> > (I'd like to use rotation of queue in later patches)
> >
> > Priority is determined by following.
> > Assume unit = total pages/1024. (the code uses different value)
> > if excess is...
> > < unit, priority = 0,
> > < unit*2, priority = 1,
> > < unit*2*2, priority = 2,
> > ...
> > < unit*2^9, priority = 9,
> > < unit*2^10, priority = 10, (> 50% to total mem)
> >
> > This patch just includes queue management part and not includes
> > selection logic from queue. Some trick will be used for selecting victims at
> > soft limit in efficient way.
> >
> > And this equips 2 queues, for anon and file. Inset/Delete of both list is
> > done at once but scan will be independent. (These 2 queues are used later.)
> >
> > Major difference from Balbir's one other than RB-tree is bahavior under
> > hierarchy. This one adds all children to queue by checking hierarchical
> > priority. This is for helping per-zone usage check on victim-selection logic.
> >
> > Changelog: v1->v2
> > - fixed comments.
> > - change base size to exponent.
> > - some micro optimization to reduce code size.
> > - considering memory hotplug, it's not good to record a value calculated
> > from totalram_pages at boot and using it later is bad manner. Fixed it.
> > - removed soft_limit_lock (spinlock)
> > - added soft_limit_update counter for avoiding mulptiple update at once.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: softlimit-test2/mm/memcontrol.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- softlimit-test2.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ softlimit-test2/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -192,7 +192,14 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> > atomic_t refcnt;
> >
> > unsigned int swappiness;
> > -
> > + /*
> > + * For soft limit.
> > + */
> > + int soft_limit_priority;
> > + struct list_head soft_limit_list[2];
> > +#define SL_ANON (0)
> > +#define SL_FILE (1)
>
> Comments for the #define please.
>
Sure.
> > + atomic_t soft_limit_update;
> > /*
> > * statistics. This must be placed at the end of memcg.
> > */
> > @@ -938,11 +945,115 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Assume "base_amount", and excess = usage - soft limit.
> > + *
> > + * 0...... if excess < base_amount
> > + * 1...... if excess < base_amount * 2
> > + * 2...... if excess < base_amount * 2^2
> > + * 3.......if excess < base_amount * 2^3
> > + * ....
> > + * 9.......if excess < base_amount * 2^9
> > + * 10 .....if excess < base_amount * 2^10
> > + *
> > + * base_amount is detemined from total pages in the system.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define SLQ_MAXPRIO (11)
> > +static struct {
> > + spinlock_t lock;
> > + struct list_head queue[SLQ_MAXPRIO][2]; /* 0:anon 1:file */
> > +} softlimitq;
> > +
> > +#define SLQ_PRIO_FACTOR (1024) /* 2^10 */
> > +
> > +static int __calc_soft_limit_prio(unsigned long excess)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long factor = totalram_pages /SLQ_PRIO_FACTOR;
>
> I would prefer to use global_lru_pages()
>
Hmm, ok.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-06 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-03 8:08 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] memcg soft limit v2 (new design) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:09 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9] soft limit framework for memcg KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] soft limit update filter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-06 9:43 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-07 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-07 2:26 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-03 8:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] soft limit queue and priority KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-06 11:05 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-06 23:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-04-06 18:42 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-06 23:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] add more hooks and check in lazy manner KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] active inactive ratio for private KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] vicitim selection logic KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9] lru reordering KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:18 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9] more event filter depend on priority KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-03 8:24 ` [RFC][PATCH ex/9] for debug KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-06 9:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/9] memcg soft limit v2 (new design) Balbir Singh
2009-04-07 0:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-24 12:24 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-24 15:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090407085555.a8818209.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox