Re: + mm-align-vmstat_works-timer.patch added to -mm tree

[KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>]

> (swich to lkml and linux-mm)
> 
> Hi Anton,
> 
> Do you have any mesurement data?
> 
> Honestly, I made the same patch few week ago.
> but I found two problems.
> 
> 1)
> work queue tracer (in -tip) reported it isn't proper rounded.

Ah, sorry ignore this sentence.
I used my local patch queue's feature for mesurement, not -tip.


> 
> The fact is, schedule_delayed_work(work, round_jiffies_relative()) is
> a bit ill.
> 
> it mean
>   - round_jiffies_relative() calculate rounded-time - jiffies
>   - schedule_delayed_work() calculate argument + jiffies
> 
> it assume no jiffies change at above two place. IOW it assume
> non preempt kernel.
> 
> 
> 2)
> > -	schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, vmstat_work, HZ + cpu);
> > +	schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, vmstat_work,
> > +				 __round_jiffies_relative(HZ, cpu));
> 
> isn't same meaning.
> 
> vmstat_work mean to move per-cpu stastics to global stastics.
> Then, (HZ + cpu) mean to avoid to touch the same global variable at the same time.
> 
> Oh well, this patch have performance regression risk on _very_ big server.
> (perhaps, only sgi?)
> 
> but I agree vmstat_work is one of most work queue heavy user.
> For power consumption view, it isn't proper behavior.
> 
> I still think improving another way.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>