From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D28266B0047 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:59:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.76]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2UNxtDS026986 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:55 +0900 Received: from smail (m6 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4862245DE54 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.96]) by m6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2D845DD72 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CE2E18003 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.106]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C42E38003 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:54 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:58:27 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/8] memcg soft limit priority array queue. Message-Id: <20090331085827.042fd4f1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090329165620.GB15608@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090327135933.789729cb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090327140653.a12c6b1e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090329165620.GB15608@balbir.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" List-ID: On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:26:20 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-03-27 14:06:53]: > > > I'm now search a way to reduce lock contention without complex... > > -Kame > > == > > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > > > > +static void __mem_cgroup_requeue(struct mem_cgroup *mem) > > +{ > > + /* enqueue to softlimit queue */ > > + int prio = mem->soft_limit_priority; > > + > > + spin_lock(&softlimitq.lock); > > + list_del_init(&mem->soft_limit_anon); > > + list_add_tail(&mem->soft_limit_anon, &softlimitq.queue[prio][SL_ANON]); > > + list_del_init(&mem->soft_limit_file,ist[SL_FILE]); > > Patch fails to build here, what is ist? > Hm...my patech is broken ? &softlimitq.queue[prio][SL_FILE] -Kame. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org