From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] memcg soft limit (yet another new design) v1
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:09:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090327140923.7dbbf677.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327135933.789729cb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
memcg's reclaim routine is designed to ignore locality andplacements and
then, inactive_anon_is_low() function doesn't take "zone" as its argument.
In later soft limit patch, we use "zone" as an arguments.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -561,15 +561,28 @@ void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(
spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
}
-static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *present_pages)
+static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ unsigned long *present_pages,
+ struct zone *z)
{
unsigned long active;
unsigned long inactive;
unsigned long gb;
unsigned long inactive_ratio;
- inactive = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
- active = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
+ if (!z) {
+ inactive = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg,
+ LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+ active = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
+ } else {
+ int nid = z->zone_pgdat->node_id;
+ int zid = zone_idx(z);
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
+
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
+ inactive = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+ active = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
+ }
gb = (inactive + active) >> (30 - PAGE_SHIFT);
if (gb)
@@ -585,14 +598,14 @@ static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct me
return inactive_ratio;
}
-int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *z)
{
unsigned long active;
unsigned long inactive;
unsigned long present_pages[2];
unsigned long inactive_ratio;
- inactive_ratio = calc_inactive_ratio(memcg, present_pages);
+ inactive_ratio = calc_inactive_ratio(memcg, present_pages, NULL);
inactive = present_pages[0];
active = present_pages[1];
@@ -2337,7 +2350,8 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
- cb->fill(cb, "inactive_ratio", calc_inactive_ratio(mem_cont, NULL));
+ cb->fill(cb, "inactive_ratio",
+ calc_inactive_ratio(mem_cont, NULL, NULL));
{
int nid, zid;
Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/include/linux/memcontrol.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_note_reclaim_prio
int priority);
extern void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
int priority);
-int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *z);
unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct zone *zone,
enum lru_list lru);
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_oom_called
}
static inline int
-mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *z)
{
return 1;
}
Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23.orig/mm/vmscan.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static int inactive_anon_is_low(struct z
if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
low = inactive_anon_is_low_global(zone);
else
- low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup);
+ low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup, NULL);
return low;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 4:59 [RFC][PATCH] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 5:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] soft limit support in res_counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 5:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] soft limit framework in memcg KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 8:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-29 17:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-27 5:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] trigger for updating soft limit information KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 5:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] memcg soft limit priority array queue KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-29 16:56 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-30 23:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 5:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-03-27 5:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] memcg soft limit (yet another new design) v1 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 8:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] soft limit victim select KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 5:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] memcg soft limit LRU reorder KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-30 7:52 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-31 0:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 6:06 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-31 6:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27 5:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] extends soft limit event filter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-28 8:23 ` [RFC][PATCH] memcg soft limit (yet another new design) v1 Balbir Singh
2009-03-28 16:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-28 18:11 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-28 18:27 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-30 23:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 5:00 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-31 5:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 5:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 6:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-31 6:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 6:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-31 6:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 6:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 0:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 5:01 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-31 5:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-31 6:07 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-30 23:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-29 13:01 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-30 23:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-01 14:42 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-01 15:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090327140923.7dbbf677.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox