linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][BUGFIX][PATCH] memcg: fix shrink_usage
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:12:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090326141246.32305fe5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090326130821.40c26cf1.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:08:21 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> This is another bug I've working on recently.
> 
> I want this (and the stale swapcache problem) to be fixed for 2.6.30.
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> ===
> From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> 
> Current mem_cgroup_shrink_usage has two problems.
> 
> 1. It doesn't call mem_cgroup_out_of_memory and doesn't update last_oom_jiffies,
>    so pagefault_out_of_memory invokes global OOM.
> 2. Considering hierarchy, shrinking has to be done from the mem_over_limit,
>    not from the memcg where the page to be charged to.
> 

Ah, i see. good cacth. 
But it seems to be the patch is a bit big and includes duplications.
Can't we divide this patch into 2 and reduce modification ?

mem_cgroup_shrink_usage() should do something proper...
My brief thinking is a patch like this, how do you think ?

Maybe renaming this function is appropriate...
==
mem_cgroup_shrink_usage() is called by shmem, but its purpose is
not different from try_charge().

In current behavior, it ignores upward hierarchy and doesn't update
OOM status of memcg. That's bad. We can simply call try_charge()
and drop charge later.

Reported-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: test/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- test.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ test/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1655,16 +1655,16 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct page 
 	if (unlikely(!mem))
 		return 0;
 
-	do {
-		progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem,
-					gfp_mask, true, false);
-		progress += mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem);
-	} while (!progress && --retry);
+	ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, mem, true);
 
+	if (!ret) {
+		css_put(&mem->css); /* refcnt by charge *//
+		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
+		if (do_swap_account)
+			res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
+	}
 	css_put(&mem->css);
-	if (!retry)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_limit_mutex);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-26  4:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-26  4:08 Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-26  4:31 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-26  5:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-03-26  5:51   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-26  6:06     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-26  6:17       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-26  6:27         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-26  6:38           ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-26  6:50             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-27  1:39             ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] " Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-27  1:51               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-26  6:00   ` [RFC][BUGFIX][PATCH] " Balbir Singh
2009-03-26  6:03     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090326141246.32305fe5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox