From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31CCD6B0099 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:59:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mt1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.74]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2P5OL4T014108 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:22 +0900 Received: from smail (m4 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9647645DE51 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.94]) by m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AAB45DE4E for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262C3E08002 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from m105.s.css.fujitsu.com (m105.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.105]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C0B1DB8037 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:20 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:22:55 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Memory controller soft limit organize cgroups (v7) Message-Id: <20090325142255.09e20c6e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090325051816.GG24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090319165713.27274.94129.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090319165735.27274.96091.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090325140752.01609cf5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090325051816.GG24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:48:17 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-03-25 14:07:52]: > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:27:35 +0530 > > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > @@ -938,16 +1031,17 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm, > > > int ret; > > > bool noswap = false; > > > > > In logical, plz add > > soft_fail_res = NULL, here. > > > > As an optimization? OK, done! > Ah, sorry....I missed that pointer was automatically initilized to NULL in res_counter_charge(). plz ignore.. -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org