From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B06916B00BD for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:52:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.71]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2N8rpqc016236 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:53:51 +0900 Received: from smail (m1 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C22A45DD74 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:53:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.91]) by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E179545DD72 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:53:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67011DB8016 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:53:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.104]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881F01DB8014 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:53:50 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:52:23 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) Message-Id: <20090323175223.94b644a0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090323083506.GN24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090319165713.27274.94129.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090323125005.0d8a7219.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090323052247.GJ24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090323151245.d6430aaa.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090323151703.de2bf9db.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090323083506.GN24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:05:06 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-03-23 15:17:03]: > Kame, if you dislike it please don't enable > memory.soft_limit_in_bytes. After having sent several revisions of > your own patchset and helping me with review of several revisions, your > sudden dislike comes as a surprise. I can't think - we need hook in mem_cgroup_charge/uncharge. - RB-tree is good. - don't taking care of kswad is enough and memcg should be independent from global memory reclaim AMAP. > Please NOTE: I am not saying we'll never see any of the reclaim > changes you are suggesting, all I am saying is lets do enough test to > prove it is needed. Lets get the functionality right and then optimize > if we have to. > But this itself is problem for me. When we added - hierarchy - swap handling - etc... Almost all bug reports are from Nishimura and Li Zefan, not from *us*. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org