From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B0526B00B2 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:31:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2N8WGwM003851 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:32:16 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E9F45DD7F for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:32:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F9B45DD7B for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:32:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F2EE08007 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:32:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from m105.s.css.fujitsu.com (m105.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.105]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EE4E08002 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:32:14 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:30:49 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Memory controller soft limit reclaim on contention (v7) Message-Id: <20090323173049.fb178a7b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090323082822.GM24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090319165713.27274.94129.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090319165752.27274.36030.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090320130630.8b9ac3c7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090322142748.GC24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090323090205.49fc95d0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090323041253.GH24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090323132045.092127da.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090323082822.GM24227@balbir.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:58:22 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > I've seen it, the basic assumption of the patch is that > > policy_zonelist() and for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask() where nodemask > is derived from policy_nodemask() give different results.. correct? > Basic thinking is that there is alloc_pages_nodemask() but try_to_free_pages() ignores nodemask. Then, removing alloc_pages_nodemask() or taking care of nodemask in try_to_free_pages() is necessary. How nodemask/zonelist is built is out of sight. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org