From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AF1A6B00AB for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:36:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.71]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2N6ZpXx018950 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:51 +0900 Received: from smail (m1 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF1545DD79 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.91]) by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3D045DD78 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575FE08003 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.103]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20121DB8013 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:50 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) In-Reply-To: <20090323151703.de2bf9db.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090323151245.d6430aaa.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090323151703.de2bf9db.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20090323153241.6A0F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:50 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:12:45 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:52:47 +0530 > > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > I have one large swap partition, so I could not test the partial-swap > > > scenario. > > > > > plz go ahead as you like, Seems no landing point now and I'd like to see > > what I can, later. I'll send no ACK nor NACK, more. > > > But I dislike the whole concept, at all. Kamezawa-san, This implementation is suck. but I think softlimit concept itself isn't suck. So, I would suggested discuss this feature based on your "memcg softlimit (Another one) v4" patch. I exept I can ack it after few spin. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org