From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v3
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:22:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090323142242.f6659457.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090323140419.40235ce3.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:04:19 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> > Nice clean-up here :)
> >
> Thanks, I'll send a cleanup patch for this part later.
>
Thank you, I'll look into.
> > > @@ -1359,18 +1373,40 @@ charge_cur_mm:
> > > return __mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, mask, ptr, true);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -void mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr)
> > > +static void
> > > +__mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr,
> > > + enum charge_type ctype)
> > > {
> > > - struct page_cgroup *pc;
> > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> > > + struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> > > + int locked = 0;
> > >
> > > if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > > return;
> > > if (!ptr)
> > > return;
> > > - pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> > > - mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(page);
> > > - __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(ptr, pc, MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED);
> > > - mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(page);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Forget old LRU when this page_cgroup is *not* used. This Used bit
> > > + * is guarded by lock_page() because the page is SwapCache.
> > > + * If this pc is on orphan LRU, it is also removed from orphan LRU here.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> > > + locked = 1;
> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > > + mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> > > + }
> > Maybe nice. I tried to use lock_page_cgroup() in add_list but I can't ;(
> > I think this works well. But I wonder...why you have to check PageCgroupUsed() ?
> > And is it correct ? Removing PageCgroupUsed() bit check is nice.
> > (This will be "usually returns true" check, anyway)
> >
> I've just copied lru_del_before_commit_swapcache.
>
ya, considering now, it seems to be silly quick-hack.
> As you say, this check will return false only in (C) case in memcg_test.txt,
> and even in (C) case calling mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(and mem_cgroup_add_lru_list later)
> would be no problem.
>
> OK, I'll remove this check.
>
Thanks,
> This is the updated version(w/o cache_charge cleanup).
>
> BTW, Should I merge reclaim part based on your patch and post it ?
>
I think not necessary. keeping changes minimum is important as BUGFIX.
We can visit here again when new -RC stage starts.
no problem from my review.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Thank you very much!
-Kame
>
> Thanks,
> Daisuke Nishimura.
> ===
> Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> ---
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 5 ++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> index 7339c7b..e65e61e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ enum {
> PCG_LOCK, /* page cgroup is locked */
> PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
> PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
> + PCG_ORPHAN, /* this is not used from memcg:s view but on global LRU */
> };
>
> #define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> @@ -46,6 +47,10 @@ TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
> TESTPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> CLEARPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
>
> +TESTPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +SETPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +CLEARPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +
> static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> {
> return page_to_nid(pc->page);
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2fc6d6c..3492286 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,50 @@ static int mem_cgroup_walk_tree(struct mem_cgroup *root, void *data,
> * When moving account, the page is not on LRU. It's isolated.
> */
>
> +/*
> + * Orphan List is a list for page_cgroup which is not free but not under
> + * any cgroup. SwapCache which is prefetched by readahead() is typical type but
> + * there are other corner cases.
> + *
> + * Usually, updates to this list happens when swap cache is readaheaded and
> + * finally used by process.
> + */
> +
> +/* for orphan page_cgroups, updated under zone->lru_lock. */
> +
> +struct orphan_list_node {
> + struct orphan_list_zone {
> + struct list_head list;
> + } zone[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> +};
> +struct orphan_list_node *orphan_list[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> +
> +static inline struct orphan_list_zone *orphan_lru(int nid, int zid)
> +{
> + /*
> + * 2 cases for this BUG_ON(), swapcache is generated while init.
> + * or NID should be invalid.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(!orphan_list[nid]);
> + return &orphan_list[nid]->zone[zid];
> +}
> +
> +static inline void remove_orphan_list(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> + ClearPageCgroupOrphan(pc);
> + list_del_init(&pc->lru);
> +}
> +
> +static void add_orphan_list(struct page *page, struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> + struct orphan_list_zone *opl;
> +
> + SetPageCgroupOrphan(pc);
> + opl = orphan_lru(page_to_nid(page), page_zonenum(page));
> + list_add_tail(&pc->lru, &opl->list);
> +}
> +
> +
> void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> {
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> @@ -380,6 +424,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> + /*
> + * If the page is SwapCache and already on global LRU, it will be on
> + * orphan list. remove here
> + */
> + if (unlikely(PageCgroupOrphan(pc))) {
> + remove_orphan_list(pc);
> + return;
> + }
> /* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> if (list_empty(&pc->lru) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
> return;
> @@ -433,51 +485,17 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> */
> smp_rmb();
> - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> - return;
> + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc) && !PageCgroupOrphan(pc)) {
> + /* handle swap cache here */
> + add_orphan_list(page, pc);
> + return;
> + }
>
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
> list_add(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * At handling SwapCache, pc->mem_cgroup may be changed while it's linked to
> - * lru because the page may.be reused after it's fully uncharged (because of
> - * SwapCache behavior).To handle that, unlink page_cgroup from LRU when charge
> - * it again. This function is only used to charge SwapCache. It's done under
> - * lock_page and expected that zone->lru_lock is never held.
> - */
> -static void mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(struct page *page)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> - struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - /*
> - * Forget old LRU when this page_cgroup is *not* used. This Used bit
> - * is guarded by lock_page() because the page is SwapCache.
> - */
> - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> - mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> -static void mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(struct page *page)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> - struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - /* link when the page is linked to LRU but page_cgroup isn't */
> - if (PageLRU(page) && list_empty(&pc->lru))
> - mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> -
> void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page,
> enum lru_list from, enum lru_list to)
> {
> @@ -784,6 +802,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_count_children(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> return num;
> }
>
> +static __init void init_orphan_lru(void)
> +{
> + struct orphan_list_node *opl;
> + int nid, zid;
> + int size = sizeof(struct orphan_list_node);
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_POSSIBLE) {
> + if (node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
> + opl = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> + else
> + opl = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(!opl);
> + for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++)
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&opl->zone[zid].list);
> + orphan_list[nid] = opl;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Visit the first child (need not be the first child as per the ordering
> * of the cgroup list, since we track last_scanned_child) of @mem and use
> @@ -1341,16 +1377,28 @@ static void
> __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr,
> enum charge_type ctype)
> {
> - struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> + struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> if (!ptr)
> return;
> - pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> - mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(page);
> +
> + /* If this pc is on orphan LRU, it is removed from orphan list here. */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> +
> + /* We should hold zone->lru_lock to protect PCG_ORPHAN. */
> + VM_BUG_ON(PageCgroupOrphan(pc));
> __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(ptr, pc, ctype);
> - mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(page);
> +
> + /* link when the page is linked to LRU but page_cgroup isn't */
> + if (PageLRU(page) && list_empty(&pc->lru))
> + mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> +
> /*
> * Now swap is on-memory. This means this page may be
> * counted both as mem and swap....double count.
> @@ -1376,8 +1424,6 @@ __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr,
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> - /* add this page(page_cgroup) to the LRU we want. */
> -
> }
>
> void mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr)
> @@ -2438,6 +2484,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
> /* root ? */
> if (cont->parent == NULL) {
> enable_swap_cgroup();
> + init_orphan_lru();
> parent = NULL;
> } else {
> parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-23 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 4:57 [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 5:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 6:11 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 7:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 9:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 1:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 3:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v1 (Re: " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 14:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 23:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 2:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 9:06 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 10:01 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 11:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-20 7:45 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 1:45 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 5:04 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-03-24 8:32 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-24 23:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 6:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 6:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 7:50 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 7:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 8:12 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 2:35 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-21 2:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 4:05 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 0:08 ` [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090323142242.f6659457.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox