From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v3
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:41:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090323114118.8b45105f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090323104555.cb7cd059.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:45:55 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> It might be a nitpick, but I think this patch cannot handle the case:
>
> processA | processB
> -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
> (free_swap_and_cache()) | (read_swap_cache_async())
> | swap_duplicate()
> swap_entry_free() == 1 |
> find_get_page() -> cannot find |
> | __set_page_locked()
> | add_to_swap_cache()
> | lru_cache_add_anon()
> | doesn't link this page to memcg's
> | LRU, because of !PageCgroupUsed.
>
> And I think we should avoid changing non-memcg code as long as possible,
> so I prefer orphan list approach.
>
> The cause of an odd behavior of the previous orphan list patch is
> the race between commit_charge_swapin and lru_add.
> PCG_ORPHAN flags is set by lru_add, so it cannot be seen while the
> page is on pvec(on another cpu). So, lru_del_before_commit_swapcache
> cannot remove the pc from orphan list.
>
> How about this patch ?
> It(rebased on mmotm) worked well(applied -rc8+some patches) during last night
> on my note-pc(i386, 2CPU, 2GB).
>
I trust your test and the patch seems to be good. I have some nitpicks.
> - change cache_charge to use try_charge_swapin() and commit_charge_swapin()
> when PageSwapCache.
> - keep zone->lru_lock while commit_charge if needed to protect PCG_ORPHAN.
>
> It only introduces orphan list and doesn't implement the reclaim part.
>
> I can post a patch only for changing cache_charge if you want.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daisuke Nishimura.
> ===
> Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> ---
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 13 +++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 203 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> index 7339c7b..47ad25c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ enum {
> PCG_LOCK, /* page cgroup is locked */
> PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
> PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
> + PCG_ORPHAN, /* this is not used from memcg:s view but on global LRU */
> };
>
> #define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> @@ -40,12 +41,24 @@ static inline void SetPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc)\
> static inline void ClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> { clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
>
> +#define TESTSETPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> +static inline int TestSetPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> + { return test_and_set_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
> +
> +#define TESTCLEARPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> +static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> + { return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
> +
> /* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
> TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
>
> TESTPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> CLEARPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
>
> +TESTPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +TESTSETPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +TESTCLEARPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +
This TESTCLEAR, TESTSET is not necessary in this approarch.
SETPCGFLAG() and CLEARPCGFLAG() seems to be enough.
All changes (including commit) is under zone->lru_lock.
> static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> {
> return page_to_nid(pc->page);
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 55dea59..39cf11f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,50 @@ static int mem_cgroup_walk_tree(struct mem_cgroup *root, void *data,
> * When moving account, the page is not on LRU. It's isolated.
> */
>
> +/*
> + * Orphan List is a list for page_cgroup which is not free but not under
> + * any cgroup. SwapCache which is prefetched by readahead() is typical type but
> + * there are other corner cases.
> + *
> + * Usually, updates to this list happens when swap cache is readaheaded and
> + * finally used by process.
> + */
> +
> +/* for orphan page_cgroups, updated under zone->lru_lock. */
> +
> +struct orphan_list_node {
> + struct orphan_list_zone {
> + struct list_head list;
> + } zone[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> +};
> +struct orphan_list_node *orphan_list[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> +
> +static inline struct orphan_list_zone *orphan_lru(int nid, int zid)
> +{
> + /*
> + * 2 cases for this BUG_ON(), swapcache is generated while init.
> + * or NID should be invalid.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(!orphan_list[nid]);
> + return &orphan_list[nid]->zone[zid];
> +}
> +
> +static inline void remove_orphan_list(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> + if (TestClearPageCgroupOrphan(pc))
> + list_del_init(&pc->lru);
> +}
> +
> +static void add_orphan_list(struct page *page, struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> + if (!TestSetPageCgroupOrphan(pc)) {
> + struct orphan_list_zone *opl;
> + opl = orphan_lru(page_to_nid(page), page_zonenum(page));
> + list_add_tail(&pc->lru, &opl->list);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
> void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> {
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> @@ -380,6 +424,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> + /*
> + * If the page is SwapCache and already on global LRU, it will be on
> + * orphan list. remove here
> + */
> + if (unlikely(PageCgroupOrphan(pc))) {
> + remove_orphan_list(pc);
> + return;
> + }
> /* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> if (list_empty(&pc->lru) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
> return;
> @@ -433,51 +485,17 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> */
> smp_rmb();
> - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> - return;
> + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> + /* handle swap cache here */
> + add_orphan_list(page, pc);
> + return;
> + }
>
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
> list_add(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * At handling SwapCache, pc->mem_cgroup may be changed while it's linked to
> - * lru because the page may.be reused after it's fully uncharged (because of
> - * SwapCache behavior).To handle that, unlink page_cgroup from LRU when charge
> - * it again. This function is only used to charge SwapCache. It's done under
> - * lock_page and expected that zone->lru_lock is never held.
> - */
> -static void mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(struct page *page)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> - struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - /*
> - * Forget old LRU when this page_cgroup is *not* used. This Used bit
> - * is guarded by lock_page() because the page is SwapCache.
> - */
> - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> - mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> -static void mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(struct page *page)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> - struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - /* link when the page is linked to LRU but page_cgroup isn't */
> - if (PageLRU(page) && list_empty(&pc->lru))
> - mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> -
> void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page,
> enum lru_list from, enum lru_list to)
> {
> @@ -784,6 +802,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_count_children(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> return num;
> }
>
> +static __init void init_orphan_lru(void)
> +{
> + struct orphan_list_node *opl;
> + int nid, zid;
> + int size = sizeof(struct orphan_list_node);
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_POSSIBLE) {
> + if (node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
> + opl = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> + else
> + opl = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(!opl);
> + for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++)
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&opl->zone[zid].list);
> + orphan_list[nid] = opl;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Visit the first child (need not be the first child as per the ordering
> * of the cgroup list, since we track last_scanned_child) of @mem and use
> @@ -1238,6 +1274,10 @@ int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page,
> MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED, NULL);
> }
>
> +static void
> +__mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr,
> + enum charge_type ctype);
> +
> int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> @@ -1274,16 +1314,6 @@ int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
> }
>
> - if (do_swap_account && PageSwapCache(page)) {
> - mem = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_swapcache(page);
> - if (mem)
> - mm = NULL;
> - else
> - mem = NULL;
> - /* SwapCache may be still linked to LRU now. */
> - mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(page);
> - }
> -
> if (unlikely(!mm && !mem))
> mm = &init_mm;
>
> @@ -1291,32 +1321,16 @@ int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> return mem_cgroup_charge_common(page, mm, gfp_mask,
> MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE, NULL);
>
> - ret = mem_cgroup_charge_common(page, mm, gfp_mask,
> - MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM, mem);
> - if (mem)
> - css_put(&mem->css);
> - if (PageSwapCache(page))
> - mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(page);
> + /* shmem */
> + if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> + ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(mm, page, gfp_mask, &mem);
> + if (!ret)
> + __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(page, mem,
> + MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM);
> + } else
> + ret = mem_cgroup_charge_common(page, mm, gfp_mask,
> + MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM, mem);
>
> - if (do_swap_account && !ret && PageSwapCache(page)) {
> - swp_entry_t ent = {.val = page_private(page)};
> - unsigned short id;
> - /* avoid double counting */
> - id = swap_cgroup_record(ent, 0);
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - mem = mem_cgroup_lookup(id);
> - if (mem) {
> - /*
> - * We did swap-in. Then, this entry is doubly counted
> - * both in mem and memsw. We uncharge it, here.
> - * Recorded ID can be obsolete. We avoid calling
> - * css_tryget()
> - */
> - res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
> - mem_cgroup_put(mem);
> - }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - }
> return ret;
> }
>
Nice clean-up here :)
> @@ -1359,18 +1373,40 @@ charge_cur_mm:
> return __mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, mask, ptr, true);
> }
>
> -void mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr)
> +static void
> +__mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *ptr,
> + enum charge_type ctype)
> {
> - struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> + struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> + int locked = 0;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> if (!ptr)
> return;
> - pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> - mem_cgroup_lru_del_before_commit_swapcache(page);
> - __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(ptr, pc, MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED);
> - mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_commit_swapcache(page);
> +
> + /*
> + * Forget old LRU when this page_cgroup is *not* used. This Used bit
> + * is guarded by lock_page() because the page is SwapCache.
> + * If this pc is on orphan LRU, it is also removed from orphan LRU here.
> + */
> + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> + locked = 1;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> + }
Maybe nice. I tried to use lock_page_cgroup() in add_list but I can't ;(
I think this works well. But I wonder...why you have to check PageCgroupUsed() ?
And is it correct ? Removing PageCgroupUsed() bit check is nice.
(This will be "usually returns true" check, anyway)
> +
> + __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(ptr, pc, ctype);
> +
> + if (locked) {
> + /* link when the page is linked to LRU but page_cgroup isn't */
> + if (PageLRU(page) && list_empty(&pc->lru))
> + mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + }
> +
Regards,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-23 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 4:57 [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 5:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 6:11 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 7:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 9:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 1:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 3:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v1 (Re: " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 14:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 23:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 2:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 9:06 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 10:01 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 11:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-20 7:45 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 1:45 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-03-23 5:04 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-24 8:32 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-24 23:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 6:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 6:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 7:50 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 7:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 8:12 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 2:35 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-21 2:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 4:05 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 0:08 ` [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090323114118.8b45105f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox