From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:47:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090320124717.8c5da82e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090319165744.27274.6335.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:27:44 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Impact: Refactor mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim()
>
> From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This patch refactors the arguments passed to
> mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() into flags, so that new parameters don't
> have to be passed as we make the reclaim routine more flexible
>
seems nice :)
Thanks,
-Kame
>
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> mm/memcontrol.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index f5b61b8..992aac8 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -227,6 +227,14 @@ pcg_default_flags[NR_CHARGE_TYPE] = {
> #define MEMFILE_TYPE(val) (((val) >> 16) & 0xffff)
> #define MEMFILE_ATTR(val) ((val) & 0xffff)
>
> +/*
> + * Reclaim flags for mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim
> + */
> +#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT 0x0
> +#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP (1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT)
> +#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT 0x1
> +#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK (1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT)
> +
> static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> static struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> @@ -889,11 +897,14 @@ mem_cgroup_select_victim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
> * If shrink==true, for avoiding to free too much, this returns immedieately.
> */
> static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap, bool shrink)
> + gfp_t gfp_mask,
> + unsigned long reclaim_options)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *victim;
> int ret, total = 0;
> int loop = 0;
> + bool noswap = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
> + bool shrink = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK;
>
> while (loop < 2) {
> victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
> @@ -1029,7 +1040,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
>
> while (1) {
> int ret;
> - bool noswap = false;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
>
> ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &fail_res,
> &soft_fail_res);
> @@ -1042,7 +1053,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
> break;
> /* mem+swap counter fails */
> res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
> - noswap = true;
> + flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
> mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res,
> memsw);
> } else
> @@ -1054,7 +1065,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
> goto nomem;
>
> ret = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
> - noswap, false);
> + flags);
> if (ret)
> continue;
>
> @@ -1766,7 +1777,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct page *page,
>
> do {
> progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem,
> - gfp_mask, true, false);
> + gfp_mask, MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP);
> progress += mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem);
> } while (!progress && --retry);
>
> @@ -1821,7 +1832,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> break;
>
> progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
> - false, true);
> + MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
> curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
> /* Usage is reduced ? */
> if (curusage >= oldusage)
> @@ -1869,7 +1880,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> if (!ret)
> break;
>
> - mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true, true);
> + mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
> + MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP |
> + MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
> curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
> /* Usage is reduced ? */
> if (curusage >= oldusage)
>
> --
> Balbir
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 16:57 [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] Memory controller soft limit documentation (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] Memory controller soft limit interface (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] Memory controller soft limit organize cgroups (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20 3:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:21 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-22 23:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 3:34 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 3:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 4:15 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 8:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 9:30 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 4:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 5:29 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 5:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 5:53 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 6:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 6:21 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 6:38 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 5:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 5:18 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20 3:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-03-22 14:21 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] Memory controller soft limit reclaim on contention (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20 4:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:27 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 0:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 4:12 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 4:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 8:28 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 3:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 5:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 5:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 6:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 6:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 6:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 8:24 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 9:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 9:23 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:35 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 9:46 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 9:41 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-24 17:34 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-24 23:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 3:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 4:02 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090320124717.8c5da82e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox