linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	guichaz@gmail.com, Alex Khesin <alexk@google.com>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
	Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: ftruncate-mmap: pages are lost after writing to mmaped file.
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:34:54 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903200334.55710.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903190902000.17240@localhost.localdomain>

On Friday 20 March 2009 03:20:57 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > But I think we do have a race in __set_page_dirty_buffers():
> >
> > The page may not have buffers between the mapping->private_lock
> > critical section and the __set_page_dirty call there. So between
> > them, another thread might do a create_empty_buffers which can
> > see !PageDirty and thus it will create clean buffers.
>
> Hmm.
>
> Creating clean buffers is locked by the page lock, nothing else.  And not
> all page dirtiers hold the page lock (in fact, most try to avoid it - the
> rule is that you either have to hold the page lock _or_ hold a reference
> to the 'mapping', and the latter is what the mmap code does, I think).
>
> So yeah, the page lock isn't sufficient.

No. FWIW, I thought there might be a race due to page fault code
not holding page lock over set_page_dirty (well there *are* some kinds
of races, but they're another story). So I tried out my patches that
move that lock over set_page_dirty for __do_fault and do_wp_page
(so the lock is held over pte_mkwrite and set_page_dirty), but that
still didn't solve the problem either.


> > Holding mapping->private_lock over the __set_page_dirty should
> > fix it, although I guess you'd want to release it before calling
> > __mark_inode_dirty so as not to put inode_lock under there. I
> > have a patch for this if it sounds reasonable.
>
> That would seem to make sense. Maybe moving the "TestSetPageDirty()" from
> inside __set_page_dirty() to the caller? Something like the appended?
>
> This is TOTALLY untested. Of course.

Yeah, probably no need to hold private_lock while tagging the radix
tree (which is what my version did). So maybe this one is a little
better. I did test mine, it worked, but it didn't solve the problem.

Still, it does appear to solve a real race, which we should close.

>
> 			Linus
>
> ---
>  fs/buffer.c |   23 +++++++++++------------
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 9f69741..891e1c7 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -760,15 +760,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_dirty_inode);
>   * If warn is true, then emit a warning if the page is not uptodate and
> has * not been truncated.
>   */
> -static int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
> +static void __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
>  		struct address_space *mapping, int warn)
>  {
> -	if (unlikely(!mapping))
> -		return !TestSetPageDirty(page);
> -
> -	if (TestSetPageDirty(page))
> -		return 0;
> -
>  	spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>  	if (page->mapping) {	/* Race with truncate? */
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && !PageUptodate(page));
> @@ -785,8 +779,6 @@ static int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>  	__mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
> -
> -	return 1;
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -816,6 +808,7 @@ static int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
>   */
>  int __set_page_dirty_buffers(struct page *page)
>  {
> +	int newly_dirty;
>  	struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
>
>  	if (unlikely(!mapping))
> @@ -831,9 +824,12 @@ int __set_page_dirty_buffers(struct page *page)
>  			bh = bh->b_this_page;
>  		} while (bh != head);
>  	}
> +	newly_dirty = !TestSetPageDirty(page);
>  	spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
>
> -	return __set_page_dirty(page, mapping, 1);
> +	if (newly_dirty)
> +		__set_page_dirty(page, mapping, 1);
> +	return newly_dirty;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_buffers);
>
> @@ -1262,8 +1258,11 @@ void mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
>  			return;
>  	}
>
> -	if (!test_set_buffer_dirty(bh))
> -		__set_page_dirty(bh->b_page, page_mapping(bh->b_page), 0);
> +	if (!test_set_buffer_dirty(bh)) {
> +		struct page *page = bh->b_page;
> +		if (!TestSetPageDirty(page))
> +			__set_page_dirty(page, page_mapping(page), 0);
> +	}
>  }
>
>  /*


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-19 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18 19:44 Ying Han
2009-03-18 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-18 22:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-18 23:18     ` Ying Han
2009-03-18 23:36       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-18 23:54         ` Ying Han
2009-03-19 15:48           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-19 16:16             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-19 16:36               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-19 16:20             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-19 16:34               ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-03-19 16:51                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-19 17:03                   ` Jan Kara
2009-03-19 17:06                     ` Jan Kara
2009-03-19 20:05                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-19 20:21                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-19 21:17                     ` Ying Han
2009-03-19 22:16                     ` Jan Kara
2009-03-19 16:46             ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24  7:44               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 10:27                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 10:32                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-24 15:35                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-26 18:29                     ` Jan Kara
2009-03-26  0:03                   ` Ying Han
2009-03-24 12:39                 ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 12:55                   ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 13:26                     ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 14:01                       ` Chris Mason
2009-03-24 14:07                         ` Jan Kara
2009-03-26  8:18                           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-03-24 14:30                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 14:47                         ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 14:56                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-24 15:29                             ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 20:14                               ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-03-26  8:47                               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-03-26 11:37                                 ` Jan Kara
2009-03-26 23:02                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-24 15:03                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 15:48                             ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 17:35                               ` Jan Kara
2009-04-01 22:36                                 ` Ying Han
2009-04-02 10:11                                   ` Jan Kara
2009-04-02 11:24                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-02 11:34                                     ` Jan Kara
2009-04-02 15:51                                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-02 17:44                                         ` Ying Han
2009-04-02 22:52                                           ` Ying Han
2009-04-02 23:39                                             ` Jan Kara
2009-04-03  0:25                                               ` Ying Han
2009-04-03  1:29                                               ` Ying Han
2009-04-03  9:41                                                 ` Jan Kara
2009-04-03 21:34                                                   ` Ying Han
2009-04-03  0:13                                     ` Ying Han
2009-03-27 20:35                 ` Ying Han
2009-03-20  0:34     ` Ying Han
2009-03-20  0:49       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-20  7:00         ` Ying Han
2009-03-25 23:15     ` Ying Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903200334.55710.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexk@google.com \
    --cc=guichaz@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=rohitseth@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox