From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v1 (Re: [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:45:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319084523.1fbcc3cb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090318231738.4e042cbd.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp>
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:17:38 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:57:34 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > How about this ? I did short test and this eems to work well.
> > I'm glad if you share us your test method.
> > (Hopefully, update memcg_debug.txt ;)
> >
> s/memcg_debug/memcg_test/ ?
>
> I don't do anything special not in the document.
> I just do one (or combination) of them for a long time and repeatedly,
> and observe what happens.
>
Hmm, ok.
> > Changes:
> > - modified condition to trigger reclaim orphan paes.
> >
> > If I get good answer, I'll repost this with CC: to Andrew.
> >
> It looks good to me.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have enough time tomorrow.
> I'll test this during this weekend and report the result in next week.
>
Okay, thank you very much. I'll review this again.
Thanks,
-Kame
>
> Thanks,
> Daisuke Nishimura.
>
> > ==
> > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > Nishimura reported unused-swap-cache is not reclaimed well under memcg.
> >
> > Assume that memory cgroup well limits the memory usage of all applications
> > and file caches, and global-LRU-scan (kswapd() etc..) never runs.
> >
> > First, there is *allowed* race to SwapCache on global LRU. There can be
> > SwapCaches on global LRU, even when swp_entry is not referred by anyone(ptes).
> > When global LRU scan runs, it will be reclaimed by try_to_free_swap().
> > But, they will not appear in memcg's private LRU and never reclaimed by
> > memcg's reclaim routines.
> >
> > Second, there are readahead SwapCaches, some of then tend to be not used
> > and reclaimed by global LRU when scan runs, at last. But they are not on
> > memcg's private LRU and will not be reclaimed until global-lru-scan runs.
> >
> > From memcg's point of view, above 2 is not very good. Especially, *unused*
> > swp_entry adds pressure to memcg's mem+swap controller and finally cause OOM.
> > (Nishimura confirmed this can cause OOM.)
> >
> > This patch tries to reclaim unused-swapcache by
> > - add a list for unused-swapcache (orphan_list)
> > - try to recalim orhan list by some threshold.
> >
> > Reported-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 13 +++
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ enum {
> > PCG_LOCK, /* page cgroup is locked */
> > PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
> > PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
> > + PCG_ORPHAN, /* this is not used from memcg:s view but on global LRU */
> > };
> >
> > #define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> > @@ -40,12 +41,24 @@ static inline void SetPageCgroup##uname(
> > static inline void ClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> > { clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
> >
> > +#define TESTSETPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> > +static inline int TestSetPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> > + { return test_and_set_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
> > +
> > +#define TESTCLEARPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> > +static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> > + { return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
> > +
> > /* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
> > TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
> >
> > TESTPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> > CLEARPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> >
> > +TESTPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> > +TESTSETPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> > +TESTCLEARPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> > +
> > static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> > {
> > return page_to_nid(pc->page);
> > Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/mm/memcontrol.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -371,6 +371,61 @@ static int mem_cgroup_walk_tree(struct m
> > * When moving account, the page is not on LRU. It's isolated.
> > */
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Orphan List is a list for page_cgroup which is not free but not under
> > + * any cgroup. SwapCache which is prefetched by readahead() is typical type but
> > + * there are other corner cases.
> > + *
> > + * Usually, updates to this list happens when swap cache is readaheaded and
> > + * finally used by process.
> > + */
> > +
> > +/* for orphan page_cgroups, updated under zone->lru_lock. */
> > +
> > +struct orphan_list_node {
> > + struct orphan_list_zone {
> > + int event;
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + } zone[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> > +};
> > +struct orphan_list_node *orphan_list[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> > +#define ORPHAN_EVENT_THRESH (256)
> > +static void check_orphan_stat(void);
> > +atomic_t nr_orphan_caches;
> > +
> > +static inline struct orphan_list_zone *orphan_lru(int nid, int zid)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * 2 cases for this BUG_ON(), swapcache is generated while init.
> > + * or NID should be invalid.
> > + */
> > + BUG_ON(!orphan_list[nid]);
> > + return &orphan_list[nid]->zone[zid];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void remove_orphan_list(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> > +{
> > + if (TestClearPageCgroupOrphan(pc)) {
> > + list_del_init(&pc->lru);
> > + atomic_dec(&nr_orphan_caches);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void add_orphan_list(struct page *page, struct page_cgroup *pc)
> > +{
> > + if (TestSetPageCgroupOrphan(pc)) {
> > + struct orphan_list_zone *opl;
> > + opl = orphan_lru(page_to_nid(page), page_zonenum(page));
> > + list_add_tail(&pc->lru, &opl->list);
> > + atomic_inc(&nr_orphan_caches);
> > + if (opl->event++ > ORPHAN_EVENT_THRESH) {
> > + check_orphan_stat();
> > + opl->event = 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> > {
> > struct page_cgroup *pc;
> > @@ -380,6 +435,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page
> > if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > return;
> > pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> > + /*
> > + * If the page is SwapCache and already on global LRU, it will be on
> > + * orphan list. remove here
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely(PageCgroupOrphan(pc))) {
> > + remove_orphan_list(pc);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > /* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> > if (list_empty(&pc->lru) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
> > return;
> > @@ -433,8 +496,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page
> > * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> > */
> > smp_rmb();
> > - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> > + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> > + /* handle swap cache here */
> > + add_orphan_list(page, pc);
> > return;
> > + }
> >
> > mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> > MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
> > @@ -471,6 +537,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_com
> > struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > + if (PageCgroupOrphan(pc))
> > + remove_orphan_list(pc);
> > +
> > /* link when the page is linked to LRU but page_cgroup isn't */
> > if (PageLRU(page) && list_empty(&pc->lru))
> > mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> > @@ -784,6 +853,119 @@ static int mem_cgroup_count_children(str
> > return num;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Using big number here for avoiding to free orphan swap-cache by readahead
> > + * We don't want to delete swap caches read by readahead.
> > + */
> > +static int orphan_thresh(void)
> > +{
> > + int nr_pages = (1 << page_cluster); /* max size of a swap readahead */
> > + int base = num_online_cpus() * 256; /* 1M per cpu if swap is 4k */
> > +
> > + nr_pages *= nr_threads/2; /* nr_threads can be too big, too small */
> > +
> > + /* too small value will kill readahead */
> > + if (nr_pages < base)
> > + return base;
> > +
> > + /* too big is not suitable here */
> > + if (nr_pages > base * 4)
> > + return base * 4;
> > +
> > + return nr_pages;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * In usual, *unused* swap cache are reclaimed by global LRU. But, if no one
> > + * kicks global LRU, they will not be reclaimed. When using memcg, it's trouble.
> > + */
> > +static int drain_orphan_swapcaches(int nid, int zid)
> > +{
> > + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> > + struct zone *zone;
> > + struct page *page;
> > + struct orphan_list_zone *lru = orphan_lru(nid, zid);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + int drain, scan;
> > +
> > + zone = &NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zones[zid];
> > + /* check one by one */
> > + scan = 0;
> > + drain = 0;
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > + while (!list_empty(&lru->list) && (scan < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX*2)) {
> > + scan++;
> > + pc = list_entry(lru->list.next, struct page_cgroup, lru);
> > + page = pc->page;
> > + /* Rotate */
> > + list_del(&pc->lru);
> > + list_add_tail(&pc->lru, &lru->list);
> > + /* get page for isolate_lru_page() */
> > + if (get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > + if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) {
> > + /* Now, This page is removed from LRU */
> > + if (trylock_page(page)) {
> > + drain += try_to_free_swap(page);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + }
> > + putback_lru_page(page);
> > + }
> > + put_page(page);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return drain;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* access without lock...serialization is not so important here. */
> > +static int last_visit;
> > +void try_delete_orphan_caches(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + int nid, zid, drain;
> > +
> > + nid = last_visit;
> > + drain = 0;
> > + while (drain < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> > + nid = next_node(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
> > + if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
> > + nid = 0;
> > + last_visit = nid;
> > + if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
> > + for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++)
> > + drain += drain_orphan_swapcaches(nid, zid);
> > + if (nid == 0)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +DECLARE_WORK(orphan_delete_work, try_delete_orphan_caches);
> > +
> > +static void check_orphan_stat(void)
> > +{
> > + if (atomic_read(&nr_orphan_caches) > orphan_thresh())
> > + schedule_work(&orphan_delete_work);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static __init void init_orphan_lru(void)
> > +{
> > + struct orphan_list_node *opl;
> > + int nid, zid;
> > +
> > + for_each_node_state(nid, N_POSSIBLE) {
> > + opl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct orphan_list_node), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + BUG_ON(!opl);
> > + for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&opl->zone[zid].list);
> > + opl->zone[zid].event = 0;
> > + }
> > + orphan_list[nid] = opl;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Visit the first child (need not be the first child as per the ordering
> > * of the cgroup list, since we track last_scanned_child) of @mem and use
> > @@ -2454,6 +2636,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
> > /* root ? */
> > if (cont->parent == NULL) {
> > enable_swap_cgroup();
> > + init_orphan_lru();
> > parent = NULL;
> > } else {
> > parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> >
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 4:57 Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 5:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 6:11 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 7:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 9:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 1:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 3:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v1 (Re: " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 14:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 23:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-03-19 2:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 9:06 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 10:01 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 11:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-20 7:45 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 1:45 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 5:04 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-24 8:32 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-24 23:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 6:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 6:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 7:50 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 7:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 8:12 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 2:35 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-21 2:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 4:05 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 0:08 ` [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090319084523.1fbcc3cb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox