From: Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v1 (Re: [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:17:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090318231738.4e042cbd.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090318175734.f5a8a446.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:57:34 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> How about this ? I did short test and this eems to work well.
> I'm glad if you share us your test method.
> (Hopefully, update memcg_debug.txt ;)
>
s/memcg_debug/memcg_test/ ?
I don't do anything special not in the document.
I just do one (or combination) of them for a long time and repeatedly,
and observe what happens.
> Changes:
> - modified condition to trigger reclaim orphan paes.
>
> If I get good answer, I'll repost this with CC: to Andrew.
>
It looks good to me.
Unfortunately, I don't have enough time tomorrow.
I'll test this during this weekend and report the result in next week.
Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
> ==
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Nishimura reported unused-swap-cache is not reclaimed well under memcg.
>
> Assume that memory cgroup well limits the memory usage of all applications
> and file caches, and global-LRU-scan (kswapd() etc..) never runs.
>
> First, there is *allowed* race to SwapCache on global LRU. There can be
> SwapCaches on global LRU, even when swp_entry is not referred by anyone(ptes).
> When global LRU scan runs, it will be reclaimed by try_to_free_swap().
> But, they will not appear in memcg's private LRU and never reclaimed by
> memcg's reclaim routines.
>
> Second, there are readahead SwapCaches, some of then tend to be not used
> and reclaimed by global LRU when scan runs, at last. But they are not on
> memcg's private LRU and will not be reclaimed until global-lru-scan runs.
>
> From memcg's point of view, above 2 is not very good. Especially, *unused*
> swp_entry adds pressure to memcg's mem+swap controller and finally cause OOM.
> (Nishimura confirmed this can cause OOM.)
>
> This patch tries to reclaim unused-swapcache by
> - add a list for unused-swapcache (orphan_list)
> - try to recalim orhan list by some threshold.
>
> Reported-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 13 +++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ enum {
> PCG_LOCK, /* page cgroup is locked */
> PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
> PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
> + PCG_ORPHAN, /* this is not used from memcg:s view but on global LRU */
> };
>
> #define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> @@ -40,12 +41,24 @@ static inline void SetPageCgroup##uname(
> static inline void ClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> { clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
>
> +#define TESTSETPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> +static inline int TestSetPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> + { return test_and_set_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
> +
> +#define TESTCLEARPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> +static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
> + { return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
> +
> /* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
> TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
>
> TESTPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> CLEARPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
>
> +TESTPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +TESTSETPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +TESTCLEARPCGFLAG(Orphan, ORPHAN)
> +
> static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> {
> return page_to_nid(pc->page);
> Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar13/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,61 @@ static int mem_cgroup_walk_tree(struct m
> * When moving account, the page is not on LRU. It's isolated.
> */
>
> +/*
> + * Orphan List is a list for page_cgroup which is not free but not under
> + * any cgroup. SwapCache which is prefetched by readahead() is typical type but
> + * there are other corner cases.
> + *
> + * Usually, updates to this list happens when swap cache is readaheaded and
> + * finally used by process.
> + */
> +
> +/* for orphan page_cgroups, updated under zone->lru_lock. */
> +
> +struct orphan_list_node {
> + struct orphan_list_zone {
> + int event;
> + struct list_head list;
> + } zone[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> +};
> +struct orphan_list_node *orphan_list[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> +#define ORPHAN_EVENT_THRESH (256)
> +static void check_orphan_stat(void);
> +atomic_t nr_orphan_caches;
> +
> +static inline struct orphan_list_zone *orphan_lru(int nid, int zid)
> +{
> + /*
> + * 2 cases for this BUG_ON(), swapcache is generated while init.
> + * or NID should be invalid.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(!orphan_list[nid]);
> + return &orphan_list[nid]->zone[zid];
> +}
> +
> +static inline void remove_orphan_list(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> + if (TestClearPageCgroupOrphan(pc)) {
> + list_del_init(&pc->lru);
> + atomic_dec(&nr_orphan_caches);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void add_orphan_list(struct page *page, struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> + if (TestSetPageCgroupOrphan(pc)) {
> + struct orphan_list_zone *opl;
> + opl = orphan_lru(page_to_nid(page), page_zonenum(page));
> + list_add_tail(&pc->lru, &opl->list);
> + atomic_inc(&nr_orphan_caches);
> + if (opl->event++ > ORPHAN_EVENT_THRESH) {
> + check_orphan_stat();
> + opl->event = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
> void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
> {
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> @@ -380,6 +435,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> + /*
> + * If the page is SwapCache and already on global LRU, it will be on
> + * orphan list. remove here
> + */
> + if (unlikely(PageCgroupOrphan(pc))) {
> + remove_orphan_list(pc);
> + return;
> + }
> /* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> if (list_empty(&pc->lru) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
> return;
> @@ -433,8 +496,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page
> * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> */
> smp_rmb();
> - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> + /* handle swap cache here */
> + add_orphan_list(page, pc);
> return;
> + }
>
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
> @@ -471,6 +537,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_lru_add_after_com
> struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + if (PageCgroupOrphan(pc))
> + remove_orphan_list(pc);
> +
> /* link when the page is linked to LRU but page_cgroup isn't */
> if (PageLRU(page) && list_empty(&pc->lru))
> mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(page, page_lru(page));
> @@ -784,6 +853,119 @@ static int mem_cgroup_count_children(str
> return num;
> }
>
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * Using big number here for avoiding to free orphan swap-cache by readahead
> + * We don't want to delete swap caches read by readahead.
> + */
> +static int orphan_thresh(void)
> +{
> + int nr_pages = (1 << page_cluster); /* max size of a swap readahead */
> + int base = num_online_cpus() * 256; /* 1M per cpu if swap is 4k */
> +
> + nr_pages *= nr_threads/2; /* nr_threads can be too big, too small */
> +
> + /* too small value will kill readahead */
> + if (nr_pages < base)
> + return base;
> +
> + /* too big is not suitable here */
> + if (nr_pages > base * 4)
> + return base * 4;
> +
> + return nr_pages;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * In usual, *unused* swap cache are reclaimed by global LRU. But, if no one
> + * kicks global LRU, they will not be reclaimed. When using memcg, it's trouble.
> + */
> +static int drain_orphan_swapcaches(int nid, int zid)
> +{
> + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + struct zone *zone;
> + struct page *page;
> + struct orphan_list_zone *lru = orphan_lru(nid, zid);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int drain, scan;
> +
> + zone = &NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zones[zid];
> + /* check one by one */
> + scan = 0;
> + drain = 0;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + while (!list_empty(&lru->list) && (scan < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX*2)) {
> + scan++;
> + pc = list_entry(lru->list.next, struct page_cgroup, lru);
> + page = pc->page;
> + /* Rotate */
> + list_del(&pc->lru);
> + list_add_tail(&pc->lru, &lru->list);
> + /* get page for isolate_lru_page() */
> + if (get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) {
> + /* Now, This page is removed from LRU */
> + if (trylock_page(page)) {
> + drain += try_to_free_swap(page);
> + unlock_page(page);
> + }
> + putback_lru_page(page);
> + }
> + put_page(page);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> +
> + return drain;
> +}
> +
> +/* access without lock...serialization is not so important here. */
> +static int last_visit;
> +void try_delete_orphan_caches(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + int nid, zid, drain;
> +
> + nid = last_visit;
> + drain = 0;
> + while (drain < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> + nid = next_node(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
> + if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
> + nid = 0;
> + last_visit = nid;
> + if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
> + for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++)
> + drain += drain_orphan_swapcaches(nid, zid);
> + if (nid == 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +DECLARE_WORK(orphan_delete_work, try_delete_orphan_caches);
> +
> +static void check_orphan_stat(void)
> +{
> + if (atomic_read(&nr_orphan_caches) > orphan_thresh())
> + schedule_work(&orphan_delete_work);
> +}
> +
> +static __init void init_orphan_lru(void)
> +{
> + struct orphan_list_node *opl;
> + int nid, zid;
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_POSSIBLE) {
> + opl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct orphan_list_node), GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(!opl);
> + for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&opl->zone[zid].list);
> + opl->zone[zid].event = 0;
> + }
> + orphan_list[nid] = opl;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Visit the first child (need not be the first child as per the ordering
> * of the cgroup list, since we track last_scanned_child) of @mem and use
> @@ -2454,6 +2636,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
> /* root ? */
> if (cont->parent == NULL) {
> enable_swap_cgroup();
> + init_orphan_lru();
> parent = NULL;
> } else {
> parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 4:57 Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 5:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 6:11 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-17 7:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 9:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 1:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 3:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-18 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v1 (Re: " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 14:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-03-18 23:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 2:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 9:06 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 10:01 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-19 10:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 11:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-20 7:45 ` [PATCH] fix unused/stale swap cache handling on memcg v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 1:45 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 5:04 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-23 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-24 8:32 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-24 23:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 6:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 6:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 7:50 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 7:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-17 8:12 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 2:35 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-21 2:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-21 4:05 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-17 8:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 0:08 ` [RFC] memcg: handle swapcache leak Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090318231738.4e042cbd.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp \
--to=d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox