From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6D776B0055 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:44:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [aarcange@redhat.com: [PATCH] fork vs gup(-fast) fix] Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:44:08 +1100 References: <1237007189.25062.91.camel@pasglop> <200903170533.48423.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903171644.09260.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Andrea Arcangeli , Ingo Molnar , Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tuesday 17 March 2009 06:22:12 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > So is all the extra flags for no > > > good reason. > > > > Which extra flags are you referring to? > > Fuck me, didn't you even read your own patch? > > What do you call PG_dontcow? It is a flag, there for a good reason. It sounded like you were seeing more than one flag, and that you thought they were useless. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org