From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A592E6B003D for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:23:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:22:32 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH] Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation In-Reply-To: <20090316120224.GA16506@infradead.org> References: <20090316105945.18131.82359.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20090316120224.GA16506@infradead.org> Message-Id: <20090316211830.1FE8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, David Howells , lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:59:45AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > > Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation describing the > > option. > > Didn't we decide a while ago that the option is pointless and the code > should always be enabled? Yeah. CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU lost existing reason by David's good patch recently. if nobody of nommu user post bug report in .30 age, I plan to remove this config option at .31 age. his patch is really really good job. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org