From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82FA26B0047 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:04:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2G94VAk031512 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:31 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EC345DD7F for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D1045DD7B for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C951DB803E for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.104]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E421DB8041 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:30 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:03:08 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Memory controller soft limit reclaim on contention (v6) Message-Id: <20090316180308.6be6b8a2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090316174943.53ec8196.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090314173043.16591.18336.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090314173111.16591.68465.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090316095258.94ae559d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090316083512.GV16897@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090316174943.53ec8196.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:49:43 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:05:12 +0530 > Balbir Singh wrote: > For example, shrink_slab() is not called. and this must be called. > > For exmaple, we may have to add > sc->call_shrink_slab > flag and set it "true" at soft limit reclaim. > At least, this check will be necessary in v7, I think. shrink_slab() should be called. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org