From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78386B003D for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:03:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:02:24 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation Message-ID: <20090316120224.GA16506@infradead.org> References: <20090316105945.18131.82359.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090316105945.18131.82359.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Howells Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:59:45AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation describing the > option. Didn't we decide a while ago that the option is pointless and the code should always be enabled? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org