From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832D26B003D for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:18:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2D7IHW0030976 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:48:17 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n2D7F4Cv3453042 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:45:04 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n2D7IGhD019409 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:18:17 +1100 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:48:12 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Memory controller soft limit patches (v5) Message-ID: <20090313071812.GL16897@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090312175603.17890.52593.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <7c3bfaf94080838cb7c2f7c54959a9f1.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> <7e852b228b80d8ba468a49bfb6551b6d.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e852b228b80d8ba468a49bfb6551b6d.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-03-13 16:07:35]: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki ?$B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?!' > > Balbir Singh ?$B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?!' > >> > >> From: Balbir Singh > >> > >> New Feature: Soft limits for memory resource controller. > >> > >> Changelog v5...v4 > >> 1. Several changes to the reclaim logic, please see the patch 4 (reclaim > >> on > >> contention). I've experimented with several possibilities for reclaim > >> and chose to come back to this due to the excellent behaviour seen > >> while > >> testing the patchset. > >> 2. Reduced the overhead of soft limits on resource counters very > >> significantly. > >> Reaim benchmark now shows almost no drop in performance. > >> > > It seems there are no changes to answer my last comments. > > > > Nack again. I'll update my own version again. > > > Sigh, this is in -mm ? okay...I'll update onto -mm as much as I can. > Very heavy work, maybe. Andrew just dropped it from -mm, so don't rush on updating. I was about to send fixes to address review comments, but I'll just merge that in -v6. -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org