From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65D06B0055 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:26:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2C8Qoal015102 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:56:50 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n2C8NcZQ540846 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:53:38 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n2C8Qndv018256 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:26:49 +1100 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:56:46 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 Message-ID: <20090312082646.GA5828@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090312095247.bf338fe8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090312034647.GA23583@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090312133949.130b20ed.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090312050423.GI23583@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090312143212.50818cd5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090312143212.50818cd5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" List-ID: * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-03-12 14:32:12]: > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:34:23 +0530 > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > Not yet.. you just posted it. I am testing my v5, which I'll post > > soon. I am seeing very good results with v5. I'll test yours later > > today. > > > > If "hooks" to usual path doesn't exist and there are no global locks, > I don't have much concern with your version. Good to know. I think it is always good to have competing patches and then collaborating and getting the best in. > But 'sorting' seems to be overkill to me. > Sorting is very useful, specially if you have many cgroups. Without sorting, how do we select what group to select first. > I'm sorry if my responce to your patch is delayed. I may not be in office. > No problem -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org