Re: [PATCH 2/4] Memory controller soft limit interface (v3)

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:00:11 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Changelog v2...v1
> 1. Add support for res_counter_check_soft_limit_locked. This is used
>    by the hierarchy code.
> 
> Add an interface to allow get/set of soft limits. Soft limits for memory plus
> swap controller (memsw) is currently not supported. Resource counters have
> been enhanced to support soft limits and new type RES_SOFT_LIMIT has been
> added. Unlike hard limits, soft limits can be directly set and do not
> need any reclaim or checks before setting them to a newer value.
> 
> Kamezawa-San raised a question as to whether soft limit should belong
> to res_counter. Since all resources understand the basic concepts of
> hard and soft limits, it is justified to add soft limits here. Soft limits
> are a generic resource usage feature, even file system quotas support
> soft limits.
> 
I don't convice adding more logics to res_counter is a good to do, yet.


Thanks,
-Kame



> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/res_counter.h |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/res_counter.c        |    3 +++
>  mm/memcontrol.c             |   20 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
> index 4c5bcf6..b5f14fa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ struct res_counter {
>  	 */
>  	unsigned long long limit;
>  	/*
> +	 * the limit that usage can be exceed
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long long soft_limit;
> +	/*
>  	 * the number of unsuccessful attempts to consume the resource
>  	 */
>  	unsigned long long failcnt;
> @@ -85,6 +89,7 @@ enum {
>  	RES_MAX_USAGE,
>  	RES_LIMIT,
>  	RES_FAILCNT,
> +	RES_SOFT_LIMIT,
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -130,6 +135,36 @@ static inline bool res_counter_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool res_counter_soft_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
> +{
> +	if (cnt->usage < cnt->soft_limit)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Get the difference between the usage and the soft limit
> + * @cnt: The counter
> + *
> + * Returns 0 if usage is less than or equal to soft limit
> + * The difference between usage and soft limit, otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long long
> +res_counter_soft_limit_excess(struct res_counter *cnt)
> +{
> +	unsigned long long excess;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
> +	if (cnt->usage <= cnt->soft_limit)
> +		excess = 0;
> +	else
> +		excess = cnt->usage - cnt->soft_limit;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
> +	return excess;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Helper function to detect if the cgroup is within it's limit or
>   * not. It's currently called from cgroup_rss_prepare()
> @@ -178,4 +213,16 @@ static inline int res_counter_set_limit(struct res_counter *cnt,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int
> +res_counter_set_soft_limit(struct res_counter *cnt,
> +				unsigned long long soft_limit)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
> +	cnt->soft_limit = soft_limit;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/res_counter.c b/kernel/res_counter.c
> index bf8e753..4e6dafe 100644
> --- a/kernel/res_counter.c
> +++ b/kernel/res_counter.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter, struct res_counter *parent)
>  {
>  	spin_lock_init(&counter->lock);
>  	counter->limit = (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX;
> +	counter->soft_limit = (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX;
>  	counter->parent = parent;
>  }
>  
> @@ -101,6 +102,8 @@ res_counter_member(struct res_counter *counter, int member)
>  		return &counter->limit;
>  	case RES_FAILCNT:
>  		return &counter->failcnt;
> +	case RES_SOFT_LIMIT:
> +		return &counter->soft_limit;
>  	};
>  
>  	BUG();
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 7bb14fd..75a7b1a 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1939,6 +1939,20 @@ static int mem_cgroup_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
>  		else
>  			ret = mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(memcg, val);
>  		break;
> +	case RES_SOFT_LIMIT:
> +		ret = res_counter_memparse_write_strategy(buffer, &val);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +		/*
> +		 * For memsw, soft limits are hard to implement in terms
> +		 * of semantics, for now, we support soft limits for
> +		 * control without swap
> +		 */
> +		if (type == _MEM)
> +			ret = res_counter_set_soft_limit(&memcg->res, val);
> +		else
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL; /* should be BUG() ? */
>  		break;
> @@ -2188,6 +2202,12 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
>  		.read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read,
>  	},
>  	{
> +		.name = "soft_limit_in_bytes",
> +		.private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_MEM, RES_SOFT_LIMIT),
> +		.write_string = mem_cgroup_write,
> +		.read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read,
> +	},
> +	{
>  		.name = "failcnt",
>  		.private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_MEM, RES_FAILCNT),
>  		.trigger = mem_cgroup_reset,
> 
> -- 
> 	Balbir
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>