From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBBA6B003D for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:52:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:51:54 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tracepoints to track pagecache transition Message-ID: <20090219185154.GA24117@infradead.org> References: <499A7CAD.9030409@bk.jp.nec.com> <1234863220.4744.34.camel@laptop> <499A99BC.2080700@bk.jp.nec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Atsushi Tsuji , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Kazuto Miyoshi , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins List-ID: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Atsushi Tsuji wrote: > > > > > > This is rather asymmetric, why don't we care about the offset for the > > > removed page? > > > > > > > Indeed. > > I added the offset to the argument for the removed page and resend fixed patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Atsushi Tsuji > > Could you package it up in one patch again and resend with [PATCH v2]. > Also make sure to Cc the memory folks, and ask for an Acked-by from them. Well, until we actually get a consumer of those tracepoints, e.g. a ftrace pluging into the tree strong NACK for me. (p.s. I really don't get it why people keep trying to push dead code into the tree) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org