From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A27916B003D for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:53:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n1BNrXkd020982 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:34 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE5F45DD7B for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951DA45DD78 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839E51DB803B for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.104]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439361DB8037 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() In-Reply-To: <20090211144509.d22feeb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090211171804.7021.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090211144509.d22feeb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: <20090212085156.C8DB.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:32 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? I think this patch obiously doesn't have any regression risk. I obey your judgement. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org