From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93C866B0055 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:18:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.75]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n0G2IBqi004687 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:18:11 +0900 Received: from smail (m5 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B7445DE4F for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:18:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.95]) by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1940A45DE4D for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:18:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF391DB8038 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:18:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from m107.s.css.fujitsu.com (m107.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.107]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44631DB803F for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:18:06 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:17:02 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] memcg: get/put parents at create/free Message-Id: <20090116111702.fba37439.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090115181243.8dad9052.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090113184533.6ffd2af9.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090114175121.275ecd59.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <7602a77a9fc6b1e8757468048fde749a.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> <20090115100330.37d89d3d.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090115110044.3a863af8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090115111420.8559bdb3.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090115133814.a52460fa.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090115164537.d402e95f.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090115165453.271848d9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090115171315.965da4e3.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090115172336.0ed780bb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090115175131.9542ae59.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090115181056.74a938d5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090116105009.7cabac46.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090115181243.8dad9052.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Daisuke Nishimura , LKML , linux-mm , Balbir Singh , Pavel Emelyanov , Li Zefan , Paul Menage List-ID: On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:12:43 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:50:09 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > > > This version works well in my test. > > > > Andrew, please pick up this one. > > > > === > > From: Daisuke Nishimura > > > > The lifetime of struct cgroup and struct mem_cgroup is different and > > mem_cgroup has its own reference count for handling references from swap_cgroup. > > > > This causes strange problem that the parent mem_cgroup dies while > > child mem_cgroup alive, and this problem causes a bug in case of use_hierarchy==1 > > because res_counter_uncharge climbs up the tree. > > > > This patch is for avoiding it by getting the parent at create, and > > putting it at freeing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura > > Reviewed-by; KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > > --- > > mm/memcontrol.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > > index fb62b43..45e1b51 100644 > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > > @@ -202,6 +202,8 @@ pcg_default_flags[NR_CHARGE_TYPE] = { > > > > static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *mem); > > static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *mem); > > +static struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *mem); > > +static void mem_cgroup_get_parent(struct mem_cgroup *mem); > > > > static void mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(struct mem_cgroup *mem, > > struct page_cgroup *pc, > > @@ -2185,10 +2187,28 @@ static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *mem) > > > > static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *mem) > > { > > - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mem->refcnt)) > > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mem->refcnt)) { > > + struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(mem); > > __mem_cgroup_free(mem); > > + if (parent) > > + mem_cgroup_put(parent); > > + } > > +} > > + > > +static struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *mem) > > +{ > > + if (!mem->res.parent) > > + return NULL; > > + return mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(mem->res.parent, res); > > } > > > > +static void mem_cgroup_get_parent(struct mem_cgroup *mem) > > +{ > > + struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(mem); > > + > > + if (parent) > > + mem_cgroup_get(parent); > > +} > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP > > static void __init enable_swap_cgroup(void) > > @@ -2237,6 +2257,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont) > > if (parent) > > mem->swappiness = get_swappiness(parent); > > atomic_set(&mem->refcnt, 1); > > + mem_cgroup_get_parent(mem); > > return &mem->css; > > free_out: > > __mem_cgroup_free(mem); > > It seems strange that we add a little helper function for the get(), > but open-code the put()? > Maybe I don't feel this as strange because I saw update history of this patch ;( As you pointed out, I like open-code rather than helper here. Nishimura-san, could you update ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org