From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBD686B005C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:59:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n0FAxdHX016435 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:59:39 +0900 Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F18645DE5D for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:59:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3407745DE51 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:59:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAF9E1800B for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:59:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.104]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F07E38005 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:59:38 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:58:34 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup/memcg : updates related to CSS Message-Id: <20090115195834.e07e604d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090115105116.GG30358@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090115192120.9956911b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090115105116.GG30358@balbir.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "menage@google.com" , "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" List-ID: On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:16 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-01-15 19:21:20]: > > > > > I'm sorry that I couldn't work so much, this week. > > No much updates but I think all comments I got are applied. > > > > About memcg part, I'll wait for that all Nishimura's fixes go ahead. > > If cgroup part looks good, please Ack. I added CC to Andrew Morton for that part. > > > > changes from previous series > > - dropeed a fix to OOM KILL (will reschedule) > > - dropped a fix to -EBUSY (will reschedule) > > - added css_is_populated() > > - added hierarchy_stat patch > > > > Known my homework is > > - resize_limit should return -EBUSY. (Li Zefan reported.) > > > > Andrew, I'll CC: you [1/4] and [2/4]. But no explicit Acked-by yet to any patches. > > > > Kamezawa-San, like you've suggested earlier, I think it is important > to split up the fixes from the development patches. I wonder if we > should start marking all patches with BUGFIX for bug fixes, so that we > can prioritize those first. > Ah yes. I'll do that from next post. patch [1/4] and [2/4] doesnt modify memcg at all. So, I added Andrew to CC. It's a new feature for cgroup. for memcg part. of course, I'll wait for all Nishimura's fixes goes to -rc. patch [3/4] will remove most of them, crazy maze of hierarchical reclaim. patch [4/4] is written for demonstration. but the output seems atractive. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org