From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:54:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090115135405.a15a6877.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090115044557.GG21516@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:15:57 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-01-15 13:41:14]:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:47:50 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-01-15 12:24:16]:
> >
> > > > But I don't like -EBUSY ;)
> > > >
> > > > When rmdir() returns -EBUSY even if there are no (visible) children and tasks,
> > > > our customer will take kdump and send it to me "please explain this kernel bug"
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure it will happen ;)
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK, but memory.stat can show why the group is busy and with
> > > move_to_parent() such issues should not occur right? I'll relook at
> > > the code. Thanks for your input.
> > >
> >
> > There was a design choice at swap_cgroup.
> >
> > At rmdir, there may be used swap entry in memcg. (mem->memsw.usage can be > 0)
> > 1. update all records in swap cgroup
> > 2. just ignore account from swap, we can treat then at swap-in.
> >
> > I implemented "2" by refcnt.
> >
> > To do "1", we have to scan all used swap_cgroup but I don't want to scan all
> > swap_cgroup entry at rmdir. It's heavy job.
> > (*) To reduce memory usage by swap_cgroup, swap_cgroup just have a pointer to memcg
> > (**) I implemented swap_cgroup as statically allocated array because I don't want
> > any dynamic memory allocation at swap-out and want to avoid unnecessary memory
> > usage.
>
> Fair enough, but I don't like that we don't have any checks for
>
> If parent still has children, parent should not go away. The
> problem that Daisuke-San is seeing.
>
The parent has "no children" in cgroup layer. It just has children in
"memory subsys" layer.
It's better to add mem_cgroup_get()/put agaisnt the parent at create()/destroy().
I'm now preparing a patch.
-Kame
> --
> Balbir
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-15 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-13 9:45 [PATCH -rc] some fixes for memcg Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: fix mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: fix error path of mem_cgroup_move_parent Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg: fix hierarchical reclaim Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: make oom less frequently Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-14 8:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-14 13:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 1:03 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 2:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 2:14 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 4:38 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 5:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 5:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 6:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 7:45 ` [RFC][PATCH] memcg: get/put parents at create/free Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 7:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 8:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 8:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 8:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-16 1:50 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] " Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 2:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-16 2:25 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 4:22 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 4:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-14 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 2:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 3:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 3:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 4:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 4:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-01-15 4:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 5:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 5:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090115135405.a15a6877.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox