From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] memcg: make oom less frequently
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:50:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113185053.155de215.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113184533.6ffd2af9.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
In previous implementation, mem_cgroup_try_charge checked the return
value of mem_cgroup_try_to_free_pages, and just retried if some pages
had been reclaimed.
But now, try_charge(and mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim called from it)
only checks whether the usage is less than the limit.
This patch tries to change the behavior as before to cause oom less frequently.
ChangeLog: RFC->v1
- removed RETRIES_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 322625f..fb62b43 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -773,10 +773,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
* but there might be left over accounting, even after children
* have left.
*/
- ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(root_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
+ ret += try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(root_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
get_swappiness(root_mem));
if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
- return 0;
+ return 1; /* indicate reclaim has succeeded */
if (!root_mem->use_hierarchy)
return ret;
@@ -787,10 +787,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
continue;
}
- ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(next_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
+ ret += try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(next_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
get_swappiness(next_mem));
if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
- return 0;
+ return 1; /* indicate reclaim has succeeded */
next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
}
return ret;
@@ -875,6 +875,8 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
ret = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
noswap);
+ if (ret)
+ continue;
/*
* try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() might not give us a full
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-13 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-13 9:45 [PATCH -rc] some fixes for memcg Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: fix mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: fix error path of mem_cgroup_move_parent Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg: fix hierarchical reclaim Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:50 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-01-14 8:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-14 13:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 1:03 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 2:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 2:14 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 4:38 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 5:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 5:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 6:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 7:45 ` [RFC][PATCH] memcg: get/put parents at create/free Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 7:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 8:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 8:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 8:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-16 1:50 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] " Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 2:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-16 2:25 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 4:22 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 4:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-14 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 2:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 3:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 3:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 4:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 4:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 5:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 5:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090113185053.155de215.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox